[openstack-dev] [release][documentation] openstackdocstheme release 1.2.7 (_independent)

2016-01-19 Thread doug
We are chuffed to announce the release of: openstackdocstheme 1.2.7: OpenStack Docs Theme This release is part of the _independent release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstackdocstheme With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Docs] Definition of a provider Network

2016-01-19 Thread Kevin Benton
Yes, that definitely needs to be cleaned up a bit as well. Provider networks still provide IP addresses, it's just that Neutron normally isn't responsible for providing L3 routing for them. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/19/2016 02:33 AM, Andreas

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] Proposal of adding puppet-oslo to OpenStack

2016-01-19 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi Xingchao, I think 'puppet-openstacklib' is designed to solve the issue with code duplication. I don't see any strong reason why we should use a puppet-oslo instead. -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

2016-01-19 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA friendlier timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs. We don't impose unnatural-working hours (too early, too late for family, etc..) to anyone, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] sponsor some LVM development

2016-01-19 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 13:40 +0100, Premysl Kouril wrote: > Hi Matt, > > thanks for letting me know, we will definitely do reach you out if we > start some activity in this area. You still haven't answered Anita's question: when you say "sponsor" do you mean provide resources to existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

2016-01-19 Thread Rossella Sblendido
On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA friendlier timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with different chairs. We don't impose unnatural-working

[openstack-dev] All hail Newton and Ocata

2016-01-19 Thread Monty Taylor
If you couldn't tell from the subject line, we've gotten clearance from our friends on the Foundation staff and their legal team to be able to announce the names of the N and O cycles. The N release will be called "Newton" Newton was the overall winner of the Condorcet poll. While you might

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Nesting /containers resource under /bays

2016-01-19 Thread Hongbin Lu
Assume your logic is applied. Should Nova remove the endpoint of managing VMs? Should Cinder remove the endpoint of managing volumes? I think the best way to deal with the heterogeneity is to introduce a common abstraction layer, not to decouple from it. The real critical functionality Magnum

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

2016-01-19 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Rossella Sblendido wrote: On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. But how does it sound to have two meetings a week, one in a EU/ASIA friendlier timezone, and another for USA/AU (current one), with

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][[Infra] Gate failure

2016-01-19 Thread Armando M.
Hi neutrinos, New week, new gate failure. This time this might be infra related [1]. This one fails with [2]. If you know what's going on, spread the word! Cheers, Armando [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269937/ [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Tuesday 1400UTC

2016-01-19 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Rossella Sblendido wrote: > >> >> >> On 01/19/2016 04:36 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: >>> >>> Thinking of this, I had another idea, a bit raw yet. >>> >>> But how does it sound to have two

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Nominating Lei Zhang (Jeffrey Zhang in English) - jeffrey4l on irc

2016-01-19 Thread Sam Yaple
+1 another full time kolla dev. w00t. Jeffrey has done some amazing reviews and great work for Kolla. Sam Yaple On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > +1 :) > > On 19 January 2016 at 07:28, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > > +1 nice work! >

[openstack-dev] [watcher] weekly meeting agenda

2016-01-19 Thread Antoine Cabot
Hello! Here is the agenda for our weekly meeting, on Wednesday at 1400 UTC on #openstack-meeting-4 [1] Feel free to add any items you'd like to discuss. Thanks, Antoine [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#01.2F20.2F2016

[openstack-dev] [heat]Delete the stack while the status of stack is CREATE_IN_PROGRESS?

2016-01-19 Thread zhu4236926
Hi guys, I find a interesting problem in Juno version. First, I create a new stack, it contains three resources, e.g. (In my test, there are six resources) heat_template_version: 2014-10-16 resources: volume1: type: OS::Cinder::Volume properties: {name: test1, size:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] api working group proposed actions guideline needs input

2016-01-19 Thread Michael Krotscheck
Is there an accepted process for this? And/or does everyone care enough to really weigh in? Some dictionary terms: Task: A piece of work to be done or undertaken. Transition: The process or a period of changing from one state or condition to another. Action: The fact or process of doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Nominating Lei Zhang (Jeffrey Zhang in English) - jeffrey4l on irc

2016-01-19 Thread Swapnil Kulkarni
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > Hi folks, > > I would like to propose Lei Zhang for our core reviewer team. Count this > proposal as a +1 vote from me. Lei has done a fantastic job in his reviews > over the last 6 weeks and has managed to

[openstack-dev] [nova][infra] Ability to run newer QEMU in Gate jobs

2016-01-19 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
Heya, Currently the live migration test job[1] is using relatively old version of QEMU (2.0 -- 2 years old, 17-APR-2014). And, libvirt 1.2.2 (released on 02-MAR-2014). For libvirt, I realize there's an in-progress thread[2] to get to a state to run a bleeding edge libvirt. How can we go about

<    1   2