[openstack-dev] [all] [keystone] Is keystone support combined authentication in release L?

hi guys. i just want to ask a small question. Is keystone support combined authentication in release L?__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] Is keystone support combined authentication in release L?

hi guys. i just want to ask a small question. Is keystone support combined authentication in release L?__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

Thanks a lot John for great leadership and all achievements. You have been very encouraging and helpful always. Regards Ghanshyam Mann On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 4:22 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Where did the flows go in ovs bridge?

My neutron version is openstack-neutron-7.0.4-1.el7 -- Original -- From: "Hirofumi Ichihara"; Date: Sun, Mar 13, 2016 10:38 AM To: "openstack-dev"; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Where did the flows go in ovs bridge?

There are many WARNING infos: 2016-03-12 08:23:28.919 30738 WARNING neutron.plugins.ml2.drivers.openvswitch.agent.openflow.ovs_ofctl.ofswitch [req-c5695ca8-b886-4092-970f-edb18d8d87cc - - - - -] Deleting flow cookie=0x86cb85757ac914ee, duration=172005.248s, table=22, n_packets=6,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Where did the flows go in ovs bridge?

Which version did you use? Neutron had the issue once. On 2016/03/13 10:54, Zhi Chang wrote: hi, guys. I deployed DVR in my local environment by following this document(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR). And I have three compute nodes which running DVR l3-agent and two

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Where did the flows go in ovs bridge?

Take a look in /var/log/neutron/openvswitch-agent.log, or similar, on the hypervisor. Doug > On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:54 PM, Zhi Chang wrote: > > hi, guys. > > I deployed DVR in my local environment by following this >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Not running for PTL

Thanks Matt for your great leadership and hardwork around QA world. It has been great working in your leadership and provided a smooth & cool environment during those period. There lot of key things we achieved and with diversity of ideas. You have been always very active and present to help

[openstack-dev] [neutron]Where did the flows go in ovs bridge?

hi, guys. I deployed DVR in my local environment by following this document(https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR). And I have three compute nodes which running DVR l3-agent and two network nodes which running DVR_SNAT l3-agent. I created a vm in one of the computes nodes.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 10/03/16 11:48, Beth Elwell wrote: > > If we will anyway have potential breakage I don’t understand why the > better solution here would not be to just use the bower and npm tools > which are standardised for JavaScript and would move Horizon more > towards using widely recognised tooling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] How do we move forward with xstatic releases?

On 10/03/16 08:46, Richard Jones wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 18:23, Matthias Runge > wrote: > > 4.alt.2: > move to proper packages for static file management. I mean, they need to > be built anyways. > > > Please define what you mean

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] PTL Candidacy for Adam Young

I am, once again, throwing my hat in the ring. No long position statement. If you know me, you know what I stand for. If you don't know me, you won;t be voting in the Keystone PTL election. I will state this: part of a successful organization is that the leadership position be held

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTL noncandidacy

On 03/11/2016 12:19 PM, David Lyle wrote: After five cycles as PTL of Horizon, I've decided not to run for the Newton cycle. I am exceptionally proud of the things we've accomplished over this time. I'm amazed by how much our project's community has grown and evolved. Looking at the community

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

Jeremy Stanley wrote: I guess for teams with no deliverables *and* no extra ATCs, they probably also don't need a PTL? My take is that those teams do not need to be an official project team either. We now require some activity before approving project teams, but packaging-deb passed before