I find this issue also, I filed a bug about it
https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-sfc/+bug/1586721
I think logical-source-port can be optional.
Regards,
Juno Zhu
IBM China Development Labs (CDL) Cloud IaaS Lab
Email: na...@cn.ibm.com
5F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech
On 6/12/2016 7:48 PM, joehuang wrote:
Hello,
This spec is not approved yet: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/
But the BP is approved:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-api
Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should Nova
Hello,
This spec is not approved yet: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295595/
But the BP is approved:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/expose-quiesce-unquiesce-api
Don't know how to deal with the spec now. Is this spec killed? Should Nova
support application level consistency
Hi team,
During the team meetings these weeks, we collaborated the initial project
roadmap. I summarized it as below. Please review.
* Implement a common container abstraction for different container runtimes.
The initial implementation will focus on supporting basic container operations
On 06/11/2016 10:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 12 June 2016 at 11:31, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> On 06/11/2016 05:02 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
> ...
>> Then keystone.conf ends up installed in /usr/etc/keystone when setup.py
>> install is used. With this configuration, it would
Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote on 06/11/2016
07:39:41 PM:
> Well, with a label you can make the Neutron Port have an SG that
> forbids pinging.
Wait, what? Labels on what can do what?
Thanks,
Mike
On 06/10/2016 12:24 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
The patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292207/ has broken decomposed
plugins. I am not sure if we can classify this as a API change – basically
Can you be more specific
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> 2016-06-10 17:01 GMT-07:00 Assaf Muller :
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Andrea Frittoli
>> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I'm working on making the client manager
I've come across several changes up for review that are tied to Newton
blueprints which have specs approved but the blueprints in launchpad are
not yet approved.
If you have a spec that was approved for Newton but your blueprint in
launchpad isn't approved yet, please ping me (mriedem) in IRC
Hello James,
No problem on my side.
Regards,
Andrey.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:20 PM, James Page wrote:
> Hi
>
> We're currently blocked on becoming an OpenStack project under the big-tent
> by the licensing of the 26 OpenStack charms under GPL v3.
>
> I'm proposing that
10 matches
Mail list logo