Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][goals] Community goals for Queen

For scheduling purposes, here is a link to the session [0]. [0] https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18732/queens-goals On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/5/2017 8:23 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >> On 05/05/2017 05:09

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][goals] Community goals for Queen

On 5/5/2017 8:23 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/05/2017 05:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: This time is tough given how front-loaded the sessions are at the Forum on Monday. The Nova onboarding session overlaps with this, along with some other sessions that impact or are related to Nova. It would

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

On 5/5/2017 6:44 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Note, when I say OpenStack below, I'm talking about nova/glance/cinder/neutron/horizon/heat/octavia/designate. No offence to the other projects intended. just trying to constrain the conversation a bit... Those parts are fairly comparable to what k8s

[openstack-dev] [cyborg] Fwd: GPU passthrough success and failure records

-- Forwarded message -- From: Blair Bethwaite Date: 6 May 2017 at 17:55 Subject: GPU passthrough success and failure records To: "openstack-oper." Hi all, I've been (very slowly) working on some docs detailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-05-04 16:14:07 +0200: > Chris Dent wrote: > > On Wed, 3 May 2017, Drew Fisher wrote: > >> "Most large customers move slowly and thus are running older versions, > >> which are EOL upstream sometimes before they even deploy them." > > > > Can someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

Excerpts from Octave J. Orgeron's message of 2017-05-05 15:35:16 -0600: > Hi Matt, > > And this is actually part of the problem for vendors. Many Oracle > engineers, including myself, have tried to get features and fixes pushed > upstream. While that may sound easy, the reality is that it

Re: [openstack-dev] [FaaS] Function as a service in OpenStack

Hi all, please let me re-surface the discussion, and propose StackStorm as [a starting point for] a Serverless framework for OpenStack. StackStorm [0] is an open source event-driven automation platform, built around Mistral and adds “before” and “after” - (triggers on events, and rules that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - are you attending the Boston summit?

Not a Neutron developer anymore but I would love to crash the party! Edgar Sent from my iPhone On May 6, 2017, at 1:34 AM, Sukhdev Kapur > wrote: Hey Neutron Folks, Following our past tradition, we should have Neutron dinner while we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] OpenStack moving both too fast and too slow at the same time

On 2017-05-05 15:35:16 -0600 (-0600), Octave J. Orgeron wrote: [...] > If it's in support of Oracle specific technologies such as Solaris, [...] > we are often shunned away because it's not Linux or "mainstream" > enough. A great example is how our Nova drivers for Solaris Zones, > Kernel Zones,