Re: [openstack-dev] [helm] multiple nova compute nodes

2018-10-02 Thread Steve Wilkerson
In addition to targeting nodes by labels (these labels are exposed for overrides in the move chart’s values.yaml, so they can be whatever labels you wish them to be), you can also disable particular templates in the nova chart. You can find these under the ‘manifests:’ key in the chart’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [helm] multiple nova compute nodes

2018-10-02 Thread Chris Friesen
On 10/2/2018 4:15 PM, Giridhar Jayavelu wrote: Hi, Currently, all nova components are packaged in same helm chart "nova". Are there any plans to separate nova-compute from rest of the services ? What should be the approach for deploying multiple nova computes nodes using OpenStack helm charts?

[openstack-dev] [helm] multiple nova compute nodes

2018-10-02 Thread Giridhar Jayavelu
Hi, Currently, all nova components are packaged in same helm chart "nova". Are there any plans to separate nova-compute from rest of the services ? What should be the approach for deploying multiple nova computes nodes using OpenStack helm charts? Thanks, Giri

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder weekly meeting Public Cloud WG

2018-10-02 Thread Tobias Rydberg
Hi everyone, Time for a new meeting for PCWG - 3rd October 0700 UTC in #openstack-publiccloud! Agenda found at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg Talk to you in a couple of hours! Cheers, Tobias -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg www.citynetwork.eu

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

2018-10-02 Thread Rodrigo Barbieri
+1 -- Rodrigo Barbieri MSc Computer Scientist OpenStack Manila Core Contributor Federal University of São Carlos On Tue, Oct 2, 2018, 17:02 Jay S Bryant wrote: > As a friend of Manila I am definitely +1 except that Cinder would like > him back full time. ;-) > > Jay > > > On 10/2/2018 12:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

2018-10-02 Thread Jay S Bryant
As a friend of Manila I am definitely +1 except that Cinder would like him back full time.  ;-) Jay On 10/2/2018 12:58 PM, Tom Barron wrote: Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. Please respond with

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-02 Thread Brian Haley
+1 from me :) -Brian On 10/02/2018 11:41 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: Hi Stable Team, I want to nominate Bernard Cafarrelli as a stable core reviewer for Neutron and related projects. Bernard has been increasing the number of stable reviews he is doing for the project [1]. Besides that, he is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-02 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 01:45:38PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/2/2018 10:41 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > > Hi Stable Team, > > > > I want to nominate Bernard Cafarrelli as a stable core reviewer for > > Neutron and related projects. Bernard has been increasing the number of > > stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/2/2018 10:41 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: Hi Stable Team, I want to nominate Bernard Cafarrelli as a stable core reviewer for Neutron and related projects. Bernard has been increasing the number of stable reviews he is doing for the project [1]. Besides that, he is a stable maintainer

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

2018-10-02 Thread Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
+1 :D El mar., 2 de oct. de 2018 a la(s) 15:00, Xing Yang (xingyang...@gmail.com) escribió: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM Tom Barron wrote: > >> Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of >> cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

2018-10-02 Thread Xing Yang
+1 On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 1:58 PM Tom Barron wrote: > Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of > cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. > > Please respond with your +1 or -1 votes. We'll hold voting open for 7 > days. > > Thanks, > > -- Tom Barron

[openstack-dev] [manila] nominating Amit Oren for manila core

2018-10-02 Thread Tom Barron
Amit Oren has contributed high quality reviews in the last couple of cycles so I would like to nominated him for manila core. Please respond with your +1 or -1 votes. We'll hold voting open for 7 days. Thanks, -- Tom Barron (tbarron)

[openstack-dev] [nova] Cancelling the notification subteam weekly meeting indefinitely

2018-10-02 Thread Balázs Gibizer
Hi, Due to low amount of ongoing work in the area there is a low interest to have this meeting going. So I'm cancelling it indefinitely[1]. Of course I'm still intereseted in helping any notification related work in the future and you can reach me in #openstack-nova as usual. cheers, gibi

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-40

2018-10-02 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
++ that was very helpful, thanks Chris! On 10/2/18 6:18 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Chris, Thanks for all the hard work you have put into this. FWIW I found value in your reports, but perhaps because I am not involved in the daily activities of the TC. Cheers -steve On 10/2/18, 8:25

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 10/2/18 6:17 PM, Mark Goddard wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Jim Rollenhagen > wrote: On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM Eric Fried wrote: > What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is > nearly the same as

[openstack-dev] [goal][python3] week 8 update

2018-10-02 Thread Doug Hellmann
This is week 8 of the "Run under Python 3 by default" goal (https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/stein/python3-first.html). == Ongoing and Completed Work == I proposed a large set of new patches to update the tox settings for repositories that were still using python2 for doc, release

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-10-02 Thread Eric Fried
On 09/28/2018 07:23 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:17 PM Chris Dent wrote: >> >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, melanie witt wrote: >> >>> I'm concerned about a lot of repetition here and maintenance headache for >>> operators. That's where the thoughts about whether we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Eric Fried
On 10/02/2018 11:09 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM Eric Fried wrote: > > > What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is > > nearly the same as your proposal. The single difference is that these > > config templates or deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-40

2018-10-02 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Chris, Thanks for all the hard work you have put into this. FWIW I found value in your reports, but perhaps because I am not involved in the daily activities of the TC. Cheers -steve On 10/2/18, 8:25 AM, "Chris Dent" wrote: HTML: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-40.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Mark Goddard
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 17:10, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM Eric Fried wrote: > >> > What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is >> > nearly the same as your proposal. The single difference is that these >> > config templates or deploy templates

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 11:40 AM Eric Fried wrote: > > What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is > > nearly the same as your proposal. The single difference is that these > > config templates or deploy templates or whatever could *also* require > > certain traits, and

[openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-02 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Hi Stable Team, I want to nominate Bernard Cafarrelli as a stable core reviewer for Neutron and related projects. Bernard has been increasing the number of stable reviews he is doing for the project [1]. Besides that, he is a stable maintainer downstream for his employer (Red Hat), so he can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Eric Fried
> What Eric is proposing (and Julia and I seem to be in favor of), is > nearly the same as your proposal. The single difference is that these > config templates or deploy templates or whatever could *also* require > certain traits, and the scheduler would use that information to pick a > node.

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 18-40

2018-10-02 Thread Chris Dent
HTML: https://anticdent.org/tc-report-18-40.html I'm going to take a break from writing the TC reports for a while. If other people (whether on the TC or not) are interested in producing their own form of a subjective review of the week's TC activity, I very much encourage you to do so. It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][tripleo] Tenks

2018-10-02 Thread Ben Nemec
On 10/2/18 9:37 AM, Mark Goddard wrote: On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 14:03, Jay Pipes > wrote: On 10/02/2018 08:58 AM, Mark Goddard wrote: > Hi, > > In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the > possibility of adding the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:38 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/01/2018 06:04 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:41 PM Eric Fried wrote: > > > > > That said, what if it was: > > > > openstack config-profile create --name BOOT_MODE_UEFI --json - > > { > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Tenks

2018-10-02 Thread Mark Goddard
On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 14:03, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 10/02/2018 08:58 AM, Mark Goddard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the > > possibility of adding the project under Ironic governance. We agreed to > > move the discussion to the mailing list.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Tenks

2018-10-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/02/2018 08:58 AM, Mark Goddard wrote: Hi, In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the possibility of adding the project under Ironic governance. We agreed to move the discussion to the mailing list. I'll introduce the project here and give everyone a chance to ask

[openstack-dev] [infra] Gerrit User Summit, November 2018

2018-10-02 Thread Adam Spiers
Hi all, The next forthcoming Gerrit User Summit 2018 will be Nov 15th-16th in Palo Alto, hosted by Cloudera. See the Gerrit User Summit page at: https://gerrit.googlesource.com/summit/2018/+/master/index.md and the event registration at: https://gus2018.eventbrite.com Hopefully some

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Tenks

2018-10-02 Thread Mark Goddard
Hi, In the most recent Ironic meeting we discussed [1] tenks, and the possibility of adding the project under Ironic governance. We agreed to move the discussion to the mailing list. I'll introduce the project here and give everyone a chance to ask questions. If things appear to move in the right

[openstack-dev] [k8s][magnum][zun] Notification of removal of in-tree K8s OpenStack Provider

2018-10-02 Thread Chris Hoge
For those projects that use OpenStack as a cloud provider for K8s, there is a patch in flight[1] to remove the in-tree OpenStack provider from the kubernetes/kubernetes repository. The provider has been deprecated for two releases, with a replacement external provider available[2]. Before we merge

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread John Garbutt
Back to the deprecation for a moment... My plan was to tell folks to use Traits to influence placement decisions, rather than capabilities. We probably can't remove the feature till we have deploy templates, but it seems wrong not to warn our users to avoid using capabilities, when 80% of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] [infra] [qa] tuning some zuul jobs from "it works" to "proper"

2018-10-02 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018, Monty Taylor wrote: Yes. Your life will be much better if you do not make more legacy jobs. They are brittle and hard to work with. New jobs should either use the devstack base job, the devstack-tempest base job or the devstack-tox-functional base job - depending on what

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-10-02 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 10/2/18 12:36 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/01/2018 06:04 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:41 PM Eric Fried wrote: > So say the user requests a node that supports UEFI because their     image > needs UEFI. Which workflow would you want here? > > 1) The

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium][networking] Seeking proposals for non-voting Stadium projects in Neutron check queue

2018-10-02 Thread thomas.morin
Hi Miguel, all, The initiative is very welcome and will help make it more efficient to develop in stadium projects. legacy-tempest-dsvm-networking-bgpvpn-bagpipe would be a candidate, for networking-bgpvpn and networking-bagpipe (it covers API and scenario tests for the BGPVPN API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/os-log-merger failed

2018-10-02 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Thanks for the info Doug. On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 6:25 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo writes: > > > Thank you for the guidance and ping Doug. > > > > Was this triggered by [1] ? or By the 1.1.0 tag pushed to gerrit? > > The release jobs are always triggered by the git tagging