Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Limits work stalled - next steps, need for new leadership

HI Sean, I think that we(Lance and I) from Huawei are willing to take over and continue this feature. I hope that we can get some information and suggestion from you. Such as: what’s the progress now? What should I do now? IMHO, the main work now is to update and polish these two specs[1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Nominating gecong for Zaqar core

+1. 2017-10-12 8:53 GMT+08:00 hao wang : > +1 > I'm very exciting to hear this. gecong is an great contributor in > Zaqar project, hope we can work together to make more awesome > features done in Zaqar. > > 2017-10-11 15:41 GMT+08:00 Thomas Herve : > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

2017 9:59 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >> On 27 March 2017 at 14:20, 王玺源 <wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com >> <mailto:wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I think the reason is quite simple: >> 1. Some users don't want to use key/value pairs to

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

7 at 03:13:59PM +0800, 王玺源 wrote: > > Hi cinder team: > > > > I want to know what's your thought about adding tags for volumes. > > > > Now Many resources, like Nova instances, Glance images, Neutron > > networks and so on, all support tagging. And some of

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

Hi cinder team: I want to know what's your thought about adding tags for volumes. Now Many resources, like Nova instances, Glance images, Neutron networks and so on, all support tagging. And some of our cloud customers want this feature in Cinder as well. It's useful for auditing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Create backup with snapshots

and backup/manager.py (to change the status back). > > Do you want to submit a bug fix for this change? > > Thanks, > Xing > > > ____ > From: 王玺源 [wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:51 PM > To: OpenStack Developmen

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Create backup with snapshots

using > the same API. So I think volume status should be changed to “backing-up” > to be consistent. Now I’m thinking the status of the snapshot should be > changed to “backing-up” too if snapshot_id is provided. > > Thanks, > Xing > > > ______

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Create backup with snapshots

Hi cinder team: We met a problem about backup create recently. The backup can be created from volumes or snapshots. In the both cases, the volume' s status is set to 'backing-up'. But as I know, when users create backup with snapshots, the volume is not used(Correct me if I'm wrong). So why the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

s well known to be terrible, which would > explain your benchmark results. If you run a similar benchmark with > caching, I'd be eager to see the new configuration and benchmark results. > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:16 AM 王玺源 <wangxiyuan1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi D

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

. Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com>于2017年2月17日 周五下午1:10写道： > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Clint Byrum <cl...@fewbar.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from 王玺源's message of 2017-02-17 14:08:30 +: > > Hi David: > > > > We have not find the perfect solution to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

ack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/ocata/token-provider-cleanup.html > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:44 AM, David Stanek <dsta...@dstanek.com> wrote: > > On 15-Feb 18:16, 王玺源 wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > PKI/PKIZ token has been removed from keystone in Ocata. B

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

-default > [4] > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:merged+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:cleanup-token-provider > [5] > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/specs/keystone/ocata/token-provider-cleanup.html > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:44 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

is large size, but the size also make it difficult for guessing or steal. David Stanek <dsta...@dstanek.com>于2017年2月15日 周三下午10:45写道： > On 15-Feb 18:16, 王玺源 wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > PKI/PKIZ token has been removed from keystone in Ocata. But recently > our > > produ

[openstack-dev] [keystone]PKI token VS Fernet token

Hello everyone, PKI/PKIZ token has been removed from keystone in Ocata. But recently our production team did some test about PKI and Fernet token (With Keystone Mitaka). They found that in large-scale production environment, Fernet token's performance is not as good as PKI. Here is the test

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [elections] Glance PTL non-candidacy

Hi Nikhil, You are the first PTL I knew when I started to work with OpenStack community, we can see your hard work for Glance during these cycles. I have learned a lot from your review suggestion. Thanks very much!!! And it's great to know that you still work on Glance. Best wishes. 2016-09-13

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Nominate Thomas Herve for Zaqar core

+1, Thomas did a great job on Zaqar. As we can see, many important feature are done by him. Welcome, thomas. 2016-07-01 6:33 GMT+08:00 Emilien Macchi : > I'm not core but Thomas helped Puppet OpenStack group many times to > get Zaqar working in gate and we highly appreciate