:
> On 03/06/2014 03:20 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
>> I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
>> RBD image support chain
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
>>
>&
I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
RBD image support chain
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
are still open after their dependency
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ was merged.
These should be low risk as:
1. W
Hi, I'm writing to call for some core-reviewers to give any eye to
some rbd related reviews that are open.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59149/
^parent https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59148/
^^parent https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/
Thanks,
Andrew W.
Mirantis.
___
I would think that the intent of the tests would be to use the /opt
partition that was attached to the instance. I would think that we should
be able to configure the resources to use /opt instead. or hack /var to be
inside /opt.
Either way, growing the root volume would likely be the most painful
Hi Kevein
the development setup docs are at
http://docs.mirantis.com/fuel-dev/develop/env.html (although they could be
slightly stale). The gist of it is that for nailgun, you need to install
all of the packages in nailgun/requirements.txt (pip install -r
requirements.txt) this should set you up p
>From my some testing I did a couple of months ago, we decided to move to
XFS to avoid the issue
I was poking around with after my file system inadvertently filled and
> found that in ex3/4 all of the inodes in the file system have to be zeroed
> prior to mkfs completing (unless the kernel is abov
All,
I'd like to ask the core reviewers to review both patch sets again since
they are now basically the same. I'd like to see either merged so the bug
cane closed and improve cinder (and ceph). We can simply determine
preference by votes.
Thanks
Andrew Woodward
Mirantis
On Fri, D
stack.org/p/bp-fuel-superfastdeploy-ci
--
Andrew Woodward
Mirantis
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Mike Scherbakov
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Most of you by now have heard of Fuel, which we’ve been working on as a
> related OpenStack project for a period of time -
> <https://gith
I've created blueprints for Fuel VMware hypervisor integration [1] and Fuel
modularization [2] and would appreciate any feedback.
Supporting a new hypervisor in Fuel creates some points on the current
methodology that need to be refactored in order to be able to provide for
multiple providers, bec
Great thread and very insightful. Yes; please make this more
accessible to other reviewers. Adding this to the wiki is a great
start.
Andrew
Mirantis
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Pitucha, Stanislaw Izaak
wrote:
> How about putting it on a wiki and linking it from the top bar of gerrit
> its
201 - 210 of 210 matches
Mail list logo