Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

, Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 December 2016 at 16:35, Ash <a...@wildernessvoice.com> wrote: > >> I tend to agree with you, Sean. Also, if there's a concern that some >> project has changed its license, then just create a fork. In the case

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] drbdmanage is no more GPL2

I tend to agree with you, Sean. Also, if there's a concern that some project has changed its license, then just create a fork. In the case of this previously GPL code, it will at least be re-distributable. In the end, I just don't think this is a huge issue that cannot be easily managed. On Mon,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Ash wrote: > > I couldn't agree more. I don't like change for the sake of change (in any >> aspect of my life). So in my mind this would have to be a way to better >> bind

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Ash wrote: > > [...] > > Here's another take on the situation. If there are people who genuinely > > wish to see a CI pipeline that can support something like Go, perhaps > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Embracing new languages in OpenStack

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Hayes, Graham wrote: > On 07/11/2016 17:14, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I literally just posted a thing on my blog with some thoughts of what > I'd expect > > any new language being proposed for OpenStack to cover before it