load balancing.
Stephen
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Bo Lin l...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi Brandon,
I have one question. If we support LoadBalancer to Listener relationship M:N,
then one listener with IPV4 service members backend may be shared by a
loadbalancer instance with IPV6 forntend
Hi Brandon,
I have one question. If we support LoadBalancer to Listener relationship M:N,
then one listener with IPV4 service members backend may be shared by a
loadbalancer instance with IPV6 forntend. Does it mean we also need to provide
IPV6 - IPV4 port forwarding functions in LBaaS
1A83
On Apr 10, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Julio Carlos Barrera Juez
juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net wrote:
Hi.
After 8 months of the patch creation and being abandoned weeks ago (
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/ ) I still don't how can we develop a
VPNaaS plugin following Bo Lin
I don't know whether i got your point. But try to modify
/neutron/tests/unit/services/vpn/test_vpnaas_driver_plugin.py like the
following, the error would be fixed:
--- a/neutron/tests/unit/services/vpn/test_vpnaas_driver_plugin.py
+++
!
Julio C. Barrera Juez
Office phone: +34 93 357 99 27
Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
http://dana.i2cat.net
On 18 February 2014 09:18, Bo Lin l...@vmware.com wrote:
blockquote
I wonder whether your neutron server codes have added
I wonder whether your neutron server codes have added the VPNaaS integration
with service type framework change on
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41827/21 , if not, the service_provider option
is useless. You need to include the change before developing your own driver.
QA (In my opinion
