ances with encrypted volumes
On 01-11-16 15:22:57, Carlton, Paul (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Lee
>
> That change is in my test version or was till I reverted it with
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391418,
>
> If you live migrate with the change you mentioned the instance goes to err
ed volumes
On 01-11-16 12:02:55, Carlton, Paul (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Daniel
>
> Yes, thanks, but the thing is this does not occur with regular volumes!
> The process seems to be you need to connect the volume then the encryptor.
> In pre migration at the destination I connect the
1:29:51
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] Issue with live migration of
instances with encrypted volumes
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:22:25AM +0000, Carlton, Paul (Cloud Services) wrote:
> I'm working on a bug https://
I'm working on a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1633033 with the live
migration of
instances with encrypted volumes. I've submitted a work in progress version of
a patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389608 but I can't overcome an issue with an
iscsi command
failure that only occ
Hi
I've inherited a series of changes from a co-worker who has moved on and have
rebased them but now I'm hitting some issues with functional tests which I can't
figure out how to resolve. The changes are
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268053
and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326899. T
Gary/All
I run devstack environments in vmware workstation and I'd like to create a vm
that has multiple numa nodes and pci devices so I can test nova code that
utilizes these features. I've tried playing with the setting documented in the
vmware documentation, i.e. adding numa.vcpu.maxPerVi
Hi
I'm investigating a issue raised by our QA team and trying to locate the
documentation or specifications that describe how
instances that use PCI-PT devices get scheduled. I'm trying to understand what
the expected behavior is when scheduling
an instance that used a port associated with a
NTIAL".
____
From: Carlton, Paul (Cloud Services)
Sent: 25 July 2016 08:21:41
To: Matthew Booth
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] Priority Spec for Libvirt Storage Pools
Matt
With help from Maxim Nestratov of V
Matt
With help from Maxim Nestratov of Virtuozzo I made some progress with the
issues relating to my libvirt storage pools spec at the mid cycle last week,
could you take another look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310505/ please,
I'd like to get this approved so I can land some changes i
Jamie
John Garbutt suggested I follow up this issue with you. I understand
you may be leading the
effort to address the issue of token expiry during a long running
operation. Nova
encounter this scenario during image snapshots and live migrations.
Is there a keystone blueprint for this issue?
10 matches
Mail list logo