Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] bug in handling of ISOLATE thread policy

2016-06-08 Thread Finucane, Stephen
On 08 Jun 10:11, Finucane, Stephen wrote: > On 07 Jun 11:36, Chris Friesen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The full details are available at > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1590091 but the short version > > is this: > > > > 1) I'm running stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] bug in handling of ISOLATE thread policy

2016-06-08 Thread Finucane, Stephen
On 07 Jun 11:36, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hi, > > The full details are available at > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1590091 but the short version > is this: > > 1) I'm running stable/mitaka in devstack. I've got a small system > with 2 pCPUs, both marked as available for pinning. They're

[openstack-dev] [nova] Standardized executable return codes/logging conventions?

2016-03-08 Thread Finucane, Stephen
I'm working on a fix [1] for bug #1538227, "Failed `nova-manage db sync` returns exitcode of 0" [2]. Having done this, I've noted that there seems to be no consistent policy around (a) what return codes to use (if any), and (b) whether to use logging or printing. Are there any guidelines on this

[openstack-dev] [nova] [stringfreeze] request for SFE

2015-04-07 Thread Finucane, Stephen
Nova cores, I would like to request a SFE for the below fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/170190/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1438226 This change adds a useful error message to help users debug incompatibilities with some versions of a dependency (libvirt). Without