Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] valid source and target for add_causal_relationship

2016-08-17 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
Yes, it should be limited to ‘ALARM’ From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 9:00 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] valid source and target for add_causal_relationship The issue

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] reference a type of alarm in template

2016-08-17 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
mplate? -- Yujun On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:24 PM Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL) <liat.har-...@nokia.com<mailto:liat.har-...@nokia.com>> wrote: Hi Yujun, The template example you are looking at is invalid. I added a new valid example (see the following link: https://review.openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] reference a type of alarm in template

2016-08-16 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
Hi Yujun, The template example you are looking at is invalid. I added a new valid example (see the following link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355840/) As Elisha wrote, the ‘type’ field means the alarm type itself or in simple words where it was generated (Vitrage/Nagios/Zabbix/AODH) The

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Template Structure Change

2016-06-16 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
Hi All, Please note that from today the id field in metadata section is renamed and from now it is called name. After updating your code, you should also update the templates which you are using in your setups. Any question is welcome, Liat

[openstack-dev] Template Validate API

2016-06-07 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
Hi, I added the Template Validation API and it now available through in both API and CLI ☺ Validation tests itself consists of content and structure tests It is possible to check a single template or several templates by providing a full path as parameter in the API request. • By given a

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Yaml file validation for Static Physical datasource

2016-05-22 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
No problem, I'll do that :) From: Weyl, Alexey (Nokia - IL) [mailto:alexey.w...@nokia.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:25 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Yaml file validation for Static Physical datasource Hi Liat, I have noticed that you are

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Austin preparation

2016-04-12 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
> - List of default Templates + testing - danoffek > - Description support in Templates - ifat_afek / (or lhartal?) I will add the description support in templates. It will be a non-mandatory field under the metadata section. In Mitaka, the template description will be available only in template

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Synchronizer - explanation and name refactoring

2016-04-11 Thread Har-Tal, Liat (Nokia - IL)
Hi All, In the last days I noticed that we have a big confusion with the main goal of the Synchronizer. This is in part due to mixed usage of the term Synchronizer in the project. Also, most of us don’t really understand the difference between synchronizer and transformer. After much