fixes
Also, last Saturday I had a short presentation about Solar in Katowice.
--
Warm regards
Jedrzej Nowak
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
:
- rework staging procedure to support both implicit and explicit stages
- vbox/qemu packer build added
- improvements for BAT transport
- fix testing examples using fuel-devops
- further packaging improvements
--
Warm regards,
Jedrzej Nowak
and swarm tests
- activities on packaging
Solar itself:
- various UX improvements
- various bugs fixed
- packaging improvements
--
Warm regards,
Jedrzej Nowak
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
As you may now we should integrate solar with fuel in 9.0. Integration in 9.0
will be very experimental and it will not affect fuel except: spec [](https://
review.openstack.org/283600)[https://review.openstack.org/283600](https://revi
ew.openstack.org/283600) and
I definitely agree with what Evgeniy said.
@Oleg could you make a step-by-step how do you imagine this
integration (with separate ConfigDB) ? To me this adds at least one
component / integration point.
> The point is that for Solar integration, we still need integration points,
> and the less
+1 for Lukasz concerns.
But if we really need operate with "solar resources database" as a kv
store, then we could implement service on top of it, It could be then
separate project, which would work as separate service. Would it fulfill
the requirements ? (we could implement it using some already
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya
wrote:
> Data resources shall fill the configdb by results of the fetched data
> shaped by data processors aka serializers. The shaping process assumes
> applying of all versioning and schema transformations knowledge