Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] gate-neutron-dsvm-api failures

2016-01-14 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
On 1/14/16, 3:04 PM, "Brian Haley" <brian.ha...@hpe.com> wrote: >On 01/14/2016 05:42 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg) wrote: >> The >>neutron.tests.api.admin.test_floating_ips_admin_actions.FloatingIPAdminTe >>stJSON >> test has been consistently failing fo

[openstack-dev] [neutron] gate-neutron-dsvm-api failures

2016-01-14 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
The neutron.tests.api.admin.test_floating_ips_admin_actions.FloatingIPAdminTestJSON test has been consistently failing for patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258754/ and I don't see how they can be related. This patch has been trying to merge for a month. This test seems to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Mid-cycle meetup for Mitaka

2015-11-05 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
++ Sounds very sensible to me! John From: "Armando M." > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Wednesday, 4 November 2015 21:23 To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs][Neutron] Networking Guide - Call for contributors

2015-10-13 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Hi Edgar, Happy to continue contributing here. Currently in GMT timezone, but probably PST by the end of the year. Looking forward to the first meeting! Cheers, John Davidge From: Edgar Magana > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron] Third Party CI Voting

2015-06-29 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron] Third Party CI Voting On 25 June 2015 at 16:08, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.commailto:jodav...@cisco.com wrote: Hi all, Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a topic which we discussed

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] [neutron] Third Party CI Voting

2015-06-25 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Hi all, Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a topic which we discussed in Vancouver: Should any Third Party CI have voting rights for neutron patches in gerrit? I’d like to suggest that they shouldn’t. A -1 from a third party CI tool can often be an

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] IPv4 transition/interoperation with IPv6

2015-05-07 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
On the subject of Prefix Delegation - yes, the external system is responsible for the routing. Here¹s a couple of video guides on using PD in Neutron and setting up the Prefix Delegation Server (in this case a dibbler server): Using Neutron PD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI830s881HQ

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-23 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Following discussion on IRC, a patch is now up to add this config option. Reviews appreciated. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/166973/ Cheers, John On 23/03/2015 18:11, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:04 PM, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-23 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Going forward, I think the best approach for PD would be to align with the subnet-pools being added by the subnet allocation BP work (thanks to Sean for bringing this to our attention again). http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/kilo/subnet-alloca tion.html#rest-api-impact

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Prefix delegation and user facing API thoughts

2015-03-18 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Copying my response on the review below: Yes that completely makes sense Sean. In our original proposal we wanted to allow the user to initiate a subnet-create without providing a CIDR, and have an 'ipv6_pd_enabled' flag which could be set in the API call to tell Neutron that this particular

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Prefix delegation using dibbler client

2015-03-12 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
17:40, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com wrote: Hello all, We now have a work-in-progress patch up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158697/ Feedback on our approach is much appreciated. Many thanks, John Davidge OpenStack@Cisco On 20/02/2015 18:28, Ihar Hrachyshka

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Prefix delegation using dibbler client

2015-02-24 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
. Cheers, Robert On 2/13/15, 12:16 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com mailto:mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:57 AM, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com mailto:jodav...@cisco.com wrote: Hi Ihar, To answer your questions in order: 1. Yes, you

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Prefix delegation using dibbler client

2015-02-13 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Hi Ihar, To answer your questions in order: 1. Yes, you are understanding the intention correctly. Dibbler doesn¹t currently support client restart, as doing so causes all existing delegated prefixes to be released back to the PD server. All subnets belonging to the router would potentially

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] [UX] Curvature interactive virtual network design

2014-11-07 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
As discussed in the Horizon contributor meet up, here at Cisco we’re interested in upstreaming our work on the Curvature dashboard into Horizon. We think that it can solve a lot of issues around guidance for new users and generally improving the experience of interacting with Neutron. Possibly