migrating to the new async only Producer objects while still
maintaining the reliability guarantees that Monasca requires.
On 12/13/16, 10:01 PM, "Tony Breeds" <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 04:03:13AM +, Keen, Joe wrote:
>
>> I
On 12/4/16, 7:36 PM, "Tony Breeds" <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 06:18:39PM +, Keen, Joe wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/2/16, 1:29 AM, "Mehdi Abaakouk" <sil...@sileht.net> wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, Dec
On 12/2/16, 1:29 AM, "Mehdi Abaakouk" <sil...@sileht.net> wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 03:29:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:52:52PM +, Keen, Joe wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately there¹s nothing wrong on the Monasca sid
On 12/1/16, 9:44 AM, "Julien Danjou" <jul...@danjou.info> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01 2016, Keen, Joe wrote:
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>[…]
>
>> The message context wrapped around every message is extra overhead we
>> don¹t want.
>> There¹s no support for b
On 12/1/16, 9:41 AM, "Joshua Harlow" <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>Keen, Joe wrote:
>> I¹ll look into testing the newest version of kafka-python and see if it
>> meets our needs. If it still isn¹t stable and performant enough what
>>are
>> the
On 12/1/16, 3:11 AM, "Julien Danjou" wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 01 2016, Mehdi Abaakouk wrote:
>
>> I'm aware of all of that, oslo.messaging patch for the new version is
>> ready since 8 months now. And we are still blocked... capping libraries,
>> whatever the reason, is very
still running into
performance and stability problems we haven’t been able to verify that the
new versions can support the Monasca use case.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/334625/
On 6/23/16, 9:37 PM, "Tony Breeds" <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2016
Davanum,
We started work on getting Monasca into the global requirements with two
reviews [1] [2] that add gate jobs and check requirements jobs for the
Monasca repositories. Some repositories are being adapted to use versions
of libraries that OpenStack currently accepts [3] and we¹re looking