Re: [openstack-dev] [All projects that use Alembic] Absence of pk on alembic_version table

2017-01-24 Thread Kirill Proskurin
se is perfectly acceptable thing to do for Newton in the > community to highlight the possibility of this situation. Downstream > folks can do what they need/have to do for Newton. > > Thanks, > Dims > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:49 AM, Kirill Proskurin > wrote: > > HI!

Re: [openstack-dev] [All projects that use Alembic] Absence of pk on alembic_version table

2017-01-24 Thread Kirill Proskurin
HI! Thing is, running Galera without enforcing it very bad idea for production use. Permissive mode was added more or less for testing purposes, running real production with it is dangerous, since it's not enforcing the mandatory Galera requirement, one of them is a "All tables must have a primary

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Fuel-ccp] Third party CI

2016-07-21 Thread Kirill Proskurin
+1 too On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote: > +1 from me > > 2016-07-19 17:42 GMT+03:00 Artur Zarzycki : > >> Hi all, >> I would like to propose Mirantis Fuel CCP CI [1] for voting permissions >> in fuel-ccp* projects. >> It runs last time as non-voting CI and it looks stabl

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][nova] Orchiestrated upgrades in kolla

2015-12-07 Thread Kirill Proskurin
Jay's approach is really neat and that how it done in big productions, sadly there is a problem with implementation of it in Kolla. I'd consider to dig into it, maybe there is nice way to do so. If not, original approach is ok too. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > >