[openstack-dev] [rabbitmq] ANN New ops-oriented guides on rabbitmq.com

2015-06-10 Thread Michael Klishin
First of all, apologies if this belongs strictly to openstack-docs, based on multiple discussions in Vancouver I'd like more people to be aware of this. As announced in April and at the summit in May, RabbitMQ team at Pivotal  would like to help with OpenStack documentation and operations

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Oslo][RabbitMQ][Shovel] Deprecate mirrored queues from HA AMQP cluster scenario

2015-06-09 Thread Michael Klishin
Nodes can become unavailable with Shovel or Federation as well. While both plugins will enqueue undelivered/unconfirmed messages internally, recovery can take a while or never happen. So replication is certainly necessary. RabbitMQ has a guide that mentions several possible failure scenarios:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Oslo][RabbitMQ][Shovel] Deprecate mirrored queues from HA AMQP cluster scenario

2015-06-09 Thread Michael Klishin
On 9 June 2015 at 10:26:27, Michael Klishin (mklis...@pivotal.io) wrote: I will push for introducing the most basic timeout support in ctl in the next bug fix release. Some (highly conservative, for the sake of backwards compatibility) improvements are already merged and will be in 3.5.4

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Fuel][Oslo][RabbitMQ][Shovel] Deprecate mirrored queues from HA AMQP cluster scenario

2015-06-08 Thread Michael Klishin
On 8 June 2015 at 15:10:15, Davanum Srinivas (dava...@gmail.com) wrote: I'd like to bring out a poll about deprecating the RabbitMQ mirrored queues for HA layout and replacing the AMQP clustering by shovel [0], [1]. I guess the federation would not be a good option, but let's consider

[openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

2015-04-28 Thread Michael Klishin
Hi,  I'm a RabbitMQ engineering team member and we'd like to help improve OpenStack docs around it. I've been reading the docs and making notes of what can be improved. We'd be happy to contribute the changes. However, we're not very familiar with the OpenStack development process and have a

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

2015-04-28 Thread Michael Klishin
On 28 April 2015 at 16:44:32, Michael Klishin (mklis...@pivotal.io) wrote: At this stage I'm trying to understand the process more than anything. E.g. how can documentation improvements to Kilo be contributed after it ships. Some of the improvements we have in mind are not HA-related

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

2015-04-28 Thread Michael Klishin
On 28 April 2015 at 16:33:35, Davanum Srinivas (dava...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello Michael. Just moving your thread to the correct mailling list. Apologies, I've signed up to openstack-docs now and will re-post there.  -- MK Staff Software Engineer, Pivotal/RabbitMQ

Re: [openstack-dev] Improving OpenStack documentation around RabbitMQ

2015-04-28 Thread Michael Klishin
On 28 April 2015 at 16:33:35, Davanum Srinivas (dava...@gmail.com) wrote: Have you seen this? https://github.com/openstack/ha-guide/tree/master/doc/high-availability-guide/ha_aa_rabbitmq That url was built from this github repo: