://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Mitsuru Kanabuchi
NTT Software Corporation
E-Mail : kanabuchi.mits...@po.ntts.co.jp
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
Mitsuru Kanabuchi
NTT Software Corporation
E-Mail : kanabuchi.mits...@po.ntts.co.jp
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
to implement idempotency token.
In my idea, idempotency token has to:
- be String (Don't use UUID)
# for avoiding UUID generate problem
- isolate per tenant
# for avoiding uniqueness check leaks
is appropriate. What do you think about that?
Mitsuru Kanabuchi
NTT
Mitsuru Kanabuchi
NTT Software Corporation
E-Mail : kanabuchi.mits...@po.ntts.co.jp
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
+1300, Steve Baker wrote:
On 10/18/2013 01:54 AM, Mitsuru Kanabuchi wrote:
Hello Mr. Clint,
Thank you for your comment and prioritization.
I'm glad to discuss you who feel same issue.
I took the liberty of targeting your blueprint at icehouse. If you don't
think it is likely
/listinfo/openstack-dev
Mitsuru Kanabuchi
NTT Software Corporation
E-Mail : kanabuchi.mits...@po.ntts.co.jp
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo