Thanks for taking this on, Victor.
Do you have a small eventlet program example that you can show the
transformation to asyncio?
Thanks, -peter
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:38 AM, victor stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to replace eventlet with asyncio in OpenStack for the
> asynchronous prog
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
> Back at the beginning of the cycle, I pushed for the idea of doing some
> log harmonization, so that the OpenStack logs, across services, made
> sense. I've pushed a proposed changes to Nova and Keystone over the past
> couple of days.
>
> This
Hi Sean,
In the last 7 days I see only 6 python27 based test failures:
http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJwcm9qZWN0Olwib3BlbnN0YWNrL3N3aWZ0XCIgQU5EIGJ1aWxkX3F1ZXVlOmdhdGUgQU5EIGJ1aWxkX25hbWU6Z2F0ZS1zd2lmdC1weXRob24qIEFORCBtZXNzYWdlOlwiRVJST1I6ICAgcHkyNzogY29tbWFuZHMgZmFpbGVkXCIiLCJmaWVs
Hi Sean,
Given the swift failure happened once in the available logstash recorded
history, do we still feel this is a major gate issue?
See:
http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJtZXNzYWdlOlwiRkFJTDogdGVzdF9ub2RlX3dyaXRlX3RpbWVvdXRcIiIsImZpZWxkcyI6W10sIm9mZnNldCI6MCwidGltZWZyYW1lIjoiYWxsI
Can you consider issuing the check job before forwarding to the gate if the
current patch set is not already (re)based against master? That way, if it
is, and there was a successful check job, even if it was days old, a new
one would not be needed? Perhaps?
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:51 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
>
> On Dec 29, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 8:12 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
>>> I've seen several disconnected messages about tags in commit messages. I've
>>> seen
>>> what is possible with the DocImpa
Has anybody considered changing how check and gate jobs work such that
the tempest and grenade checks only run once the docs/pep8/unittests
jobs all succeed?
It seems like they complete so much quicker that folks can fix those
bugs before having to wait hours for the other jobs.
Thoughts, concern
Giulio, are you speaking for Red Hat here, or is this just your
opinion? And have you actually tried to doing what you propose?
Regards, -peter
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 09:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, November 25, 2013 7:35:51 AM, Z
Hi Alex,
It seems that this is likely an rsyslog limit, so you might want to
check out: http://www.rsyslog.com/doc/rsyslog_conf_global.html
Specifically, the info on "$MaxMessageSize"
Regards, -peter
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Pecoraro, Alex wrote:
> Is there any way for me to change the l
face-to-face discussions
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Peter Portante wrote:
> > We are hosting a G+ Hangout session for those interested in OpenStack
> > Swift to do an
> > overview, code walk-through, discussion and feedback on the
UID:mlev82t0n9fg2cfre4u7ha7...@google.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
TRUE;CN=openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:openstack-d
e...@lists.openstack.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=Peter Portante;X-NUM
UID:mlev82t0n9fg2cfre4u7ha7...@google.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
TRUE;CN=openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:openstack-d
e...@lists.openstack.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
;CN=Peter Portante;X-NUM
12 matches
Mail list logo
