Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] upgrade from liberty to mitaka

2016-10-16 Thread Richard Woo
Ihar, After looking at version of python-neutron-fwaas package, I found it is still the old one. I upgraded this package to mitaka version, the problem went away. Thanks for your help. Richard On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Richard Woo <richardwoo2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ihar, &

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] upgrade from liberty to mitaka

2016-10-16 Thread Richard Woo
' is enabled but not fwaas: # The core plugin Neutron will use (string value) core_plugin = ml2 # The service plugins Neutron will use (list value) service_plugins = router Richard On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrac...@redhat.com> wrote: > Richard Woo <richardwoo2.

[openstack-dev] [neutron] upgrade from liberty to mitaka

2016-10-15 Thread Richard Woo
Hello, folks, I have a small cluster running openstack liberty, today I am starting to upgrading to Mitaka. I am having a problem to launch l3 agent on network node. I got the following error: Guru mediation now registers SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 by default for backward compatibility. SIGUSR1 will

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][security-group] rules for filter mac-addresses

2015-07-16 Thread Richard Woo
Sean, I agreed with you. But after I read Yan's user case. I think the FWaaS API may become too complex for that case. By extending security group is better option. On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:31:49AM PDT, Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - the setup of a DHCP sub-group

2014-11-27 Thread Richard Woo
Don, the spec is location at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/neutron-specs/ On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Don Kehn dek...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, will try and gen to it over the holiday, do you have a link to the spec repo? On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Carl Baldwin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] BGP - VPN BoF session in Kilo design summit

2014-11-04 Thread Richard Woo
Did we have room for this discussion? On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks Jaume, it make sense since those use cases need l3-agent refectoring. I've updated the BGPVPN etherpad [1] with materials used during today's techtalk. I hope

[openstack-dev] [neutron][opendaylight]OpenDaylight Neutron Plugin design session etherpad

2014-11-03 Thread Richard Woo
Hi, what is etherpad link for opendaylight neutron plugin design session? http://kilodesignsummit.sched.org/event/5a430f46842e9239ea6c29a69cbe4e84#.VFdhdPTF-0E Thanks, Richard ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [nfv] VM-based VLAN trunking blueprints

2014-11-03 Thread Richard Woo
Hello, will this topic be discussed in the design session? Richard On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Erik Moe erik@ericsson.com wrote: I created an etherpad and added use cases (so far just the ones in your email). https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tenant_vlans /Erik *From:*

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [neutron] [tc] Neutron Incubator workflow

2014-08-28 Thread Richard Woo
I have another question about incubator proposal, for CLI and GUI. Do we imply that the incubator feature will need to branch python-neutron client, Horizon, and or Nova ( if changes are needed)? On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:09 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi, After reading

Re: [openstack-dev] How to improve the specs review process (was Re: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward)

2014-08-06 Thread Richard Woo
+1, I think in future we should invite the other project(i.e. Nova) core member to review the blueprint if it is related to that specific project. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote: Yes, indeed. I do not want to be over dramatic but the discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Richard Woo
+1 On Aug 6, 2014 7:07 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: I was asked beforehand what I mean with * consider GBP an 'experimental' V3 tenant API (this was mentioned somewhere in this thread) and treat it accordingly The group based policies, although implemented as a service

Re: [openstack-dev] How to improve the specs review process (was Re: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward)

2014-08-06 Thread Richard Woo
I agreed with Jay. Nova is one of the consumer of Neutron project, someone from Nova project should participate reviewing related blueprint in neutron project. Richard On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/06/2014 07:54 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] DVR blueprint document locked / private

2014-02-18 Thread Richard Woo
Hello, Swami, Would you mind to forward the powerpoint slide link again? Thanks, Richard On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) swaminathan.vasude...@hp.com wrote: Hi Assaf, Thanks for letting me know. This document was completely open and accessible by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Woo
Shixiong, Thank you for the updates, do you mind to share the slide to the openstack mailing list? Richard On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Shixiong Shang sparkofwisdom.cl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, guys: We had a great discussion tonight with stackers from Comcast, IBM, HP, Cisco and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Webex Recording of IPv6 / Neutron Sync-up

2013-12-04 Thread Richard Woo
to help. Thanks for showing the interests in our work! Shixiong On Dec 4, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Richard Woo richardwoo2...@gmail.com wrote: Shixiong, Thank you for the updates, do you mind to share the slide to the openstack mailing list? Richard On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:30 PM