Hi,
There are certainly exist a bug in stackalytics [1]. Current contribution
to different openstack/* projects was counted for deb-* . Now all affected
commit records on stackalytics are removed from deb-* projects, but they
should be moved to proper non-deb projects. Is there any one how could
Hi,
1) lets call it for the times - Overview
2) Actions statistics - because there is a statistic by actions
3) I suggest to keep it. And add to the docs that we have idle and load
durations. I think people not fully understand those two terms and to
change report is not the best way to improve th
Hi,
"need to have something (tempest-plugin) to make sure that integration
works with nova & neutron" - Its easy to write scenarios that will test
that octavia works with nova and neutron
"I guess rally is more suited to make sure that things work at scale, to
uncover any sort of race condition
HI,
Great to hear it! From the view of Rally team=)
-Best regards, Roman Vasylets
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Ricardo Rocha
wrote:
> Hi Ton.
>
> I think we should. Also in cases where multiple volume types are available
> (in our case with different iops) there would be additional parame
Hi,
This feature is under the work. We have made already the great work:
Introduced task format converter [1] and made patch related to DB
refactoring [2]. After we will merge [2] patch we will be able to move on
and implement next work items. [2] was the hardest part thus it takes a lot
of time.
Hi all, personally I want to suggest* crossload. *Concept is similar to
cross training(training in two or more sports in order to improve fitness
and performance, especially in a main sport.) in sport. By that template -
crossload is load in two or more areas in order to improve durability and
perf
Hi, don't panic=) Looks like it is not you fault. I'm watching out for your
patch.
Best regards, Roman Vasilets.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Wu, Liming
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have push a simple patch to rally, but " Mirantis Rally CI check" was
> not pas
Hi guys. I took minimal configuration of devstack from here
https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/doc/source/configuration.rst
And tried to boot server. It was booted but there is no internet connection
on the instance. Does some one faced with such an issue? I have no idea
how fix
>I also suggest their time has probably come and gone. There is no one
>active on them, and the Rally team is.
Fully agree with idea to use Rally for large-ops. It was build for testing
OpenStack under the scale=)
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Tony Breeds
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 0
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify who will lead topic discussion. Add some information about
topic(links, etc.) Thank you fo
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify who will lead topic discussion. Add some information about
topic(links, etc.) Thank you fo
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify who will lead topic discussion. Add some information about
topic(links, etc.) Thank you fo
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify who will lead topic discusion. Add some information about
topic(links, etc.) Thank you for
As for me two ideal candidates for tags are "works-in-rally" and
"covered-by-rally". Other sound ugly. But this two are meaningful and
ingenious names.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:13 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Thierry,
>
> Okay great I will propose patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris Pavlovic
>
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Hi,
Could you provide the link to this code?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Pradeep Kilambi
wrote:
> We're in the process of converting existing meters to use a more
> declarative approach where we add the meter definition as part of a yaml.
> As part of this transition there are few notifi
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Rally? Something else? What can we do to measure this?
Of cause, if you looking for instrument for measure performance - Rally is
the best choice!
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 08/03/2015 02:24 PM, Jesse Cook wrote:
>
>
your attention.
- Best regards, Vasilets Roman.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Roman Vasilets
wrote:
> Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
> Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally
I have updated it. Thank you for sharing a link.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 27/07/2015 12:35, Roman Vasilets wrote:
>
>> Hi, just what to share with you. Rally project also have voting py34
>> jobs. Thank you.
>>
>
>
Hi, just what to share with you. Rally project also have voting py34 jobs.
Thank you.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are close to having a voting py34 gate on all OpenStack libraries and
> applications. I just made the py34 gate voting for the 5 following pro
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Hi, its a friendly reminder that if you what to discuss some topics at
Rally meetings, please add you topic to our Meeting agenda
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Rally#Agenda. Don't forget to
specify by whom led this topic. Add some information about topic(links,
etc.) Thank you for your a
Thanks for presentation Rally team at Summit. Nice T-shirt at fist video!
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.o
Mikhail Dubov. Ready for review - patches that are waiting for attention.
And the last section - its patches with -1 mark but they passed CI.
Roman Vasilets, Mirantis Inc.
Intern Software Engineer
__
OpenStack Development
Hi,
Agree with all proposes. But maybe it's make sense to do a bigger interval
between mitings to make as much as possible work for the next meting. For
example Monday/Thursday. Its not principal for me.
-Thanks, Roman Vasilets.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
&g
28 matches
Mail list logo