and I'd like
suggest him as core reviewer of TripleO in CI related code.
Please vote!
My +1 is here :)
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
; <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/b/1/embed?src=whayu...@redhat.com=America/New_York>
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-
___
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
ible-role-redhat-
> subscription/
> [2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-keystone/
> [3] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/puppet-openstacklib/
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/565856/
> [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569830
>
23, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi, Sergii
> >
> > thanks for the question. It's not first time that this topic is raised
> and
> &g
ubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
t extended time of
>> the main zuul pipeline. I think it makes sense and that extended CI time
>> will not overhead the RDO CI execution times so much to become a problem.
>> WDYT?
>>
>> [0] https://revi
solete, all CI jobs now using configs
> download AFAICT...
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Dobrelya,
> Irc #bogdando
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscri
/
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
feedback.
> Thanks everyone,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/
pment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
___
ovb jobs as
experimental to check if we have the same results (or better :) )
10) OVB jobs on rh1 cloud stay in experimental pipeline in tripleo for a
next month or two.
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development
legacy engine.
>
>
TripleO CI has heat-convergence job running on heat patches in experimental
pipeline [1] It runs there during last year at least.
No any high memory usage was detected in last few months when I watched it.
[1]
https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/
gt; Please let us know if this method sounds like a step forward.
> >
> >
> > ____
> __
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lis
y to reproduce a gate
>> job on a local virthost by typing something like:
>>
>> ./quickstart.sh --release tripleo-ci/master \
>> --nodes config/nodes/3ctlr_1comp.yml \
>> --config config/general_config/featureset001.yml \
>>
>>
>> Please let us know if this me
Hi,
FYI that gates now are blocked because of [1] and containers jobs now are
part of gate jobs. Please try to resolve it asap.
Thanks
[1] CI: containers jobs fail in pingtest because volume error:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1700333
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
et/tripleo/+bugs?field.tag=deployment-time Please
use it for bugs that affect deployment time or CI job run time. It will be
easier to handle them in the sprint.
Please provide your comments and suggestions.
Thanks
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com> w
Hi
I think a "deep dive" about containers in TripleO and some helpful
documentation would help a lot for valuable reviews of these container
patches. The knowledge gap that's accumulated here is pretty big.
Thanks
On Jun 5, 2017 03:39, "Dan Prince" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any help
ollection, profiling and detection of places to
optimize. After this tasks are created, patches are tested and submitted.
The prizes will be presented to teams which saved most of time :)
What do you think?
Thanks
--
Best re
(not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Developmen
install (+another specific
features?)
3) ovb updates job
thoughts?
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
ks,
> --
> Emilien Macchi
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.or
[2] https://review.openstack.org/450023
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
gt; > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 06:54:27PM +0200, Sagi Shnaidman
ink it's appropriate
behavior, although not sure it's the reason for failing jobs. Any ideas why
it could happen?
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe
a day like it happens now or with "low" priority.
Thanks
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Paul Belanger <pabelan...@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> &
eetings to this list.
>
> - trown
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
r to run all experimental jobs we have at
once, please provide a feedback and I'll take it back.
Patch about the topic: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425184/
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Develo
Hi, all
FYI, the periodic TripleO nonha jobs fail because of introspection failure,
there is opened bug in mistral:
Ironic introspection fails because unexpected keyword "insecure"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1656692
and marked as promotion blocker.
Thanks
--
Best re
everything
for you (as all scripts should do usually).
In case you need to test your patch, just send me your *public* keys
*offline*, I'll add them to tenant defaults and you'll be able to run it.
Thanks
[1] https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
and it
should be updated on next promotion job run.
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
on
overcloud controllers.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs, all of them
> >
this if
it works and no problems appear.
TripleO CI cloud admins, please increase the memory for baremetal flavor on
rh1 tomorrow (to 6144?).
Thanks
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357532/
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1610073
[5]
https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/scripts/tripleo.sh#L100
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349261
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Alan Pevec <ape...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > How then it worked before? Can you show me the patch that broke this
> > functionality in delorean? It sh
s a quickfix in tripleo.sh you could patch dlrn and set local=True in
>
> correction, patch local=False there while running dlrn command with
> --local to keep source checkout as-is
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
checkouts to the branches
> specified in projects.ini
>
> Alan,
I don't want to reset local checkouts and reset branches - I need to build
with these checkout, it's all CI is for.
> Alan
>
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
___
itrepo_driver]
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
ould like to discuss
it in separate meeting, I'll give the all required info.
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...
Sorry, missed the mentioned patches:
[1] Refresh log files for tripleo project:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312985/
[2] Add bug for TripleO timeouts: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313038/
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, all
>
ce for openstack "
and various puppet errors.
However almost all of these messages could have different root causes,
except of network failures. Easy to fix bug doesn't make to submit there,
because they will be fixed yet before recheck patch will be merged.
So, could you ple
For making clear all advantages and disadvantages, I've created a doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmY-I8OzoJt0SzLzs79hCa1smKGltb-byrJOkKKGXII/edit?usp=sharing
Please comment.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
&
to very
dynamical configuration.
So, do we need to use pure upstream tempest from current source and to
maintain configuration scripts or we can use packaged from delorean and not
duplicate effort of test teams?
Thanks
--
Best regards
Sagi Shnaidman
Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshna...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, all
>>
>> I'd like to discuss the topic about how do we configure tempest in CI
>> jobs for TripleO.
>> I have currently two patches:
>> support for tempe
u'd fix it by
another workarounds and tempest_config runs, because it's still a few of
skipped tests, so configuration is not full as it would be done with
config_tempest.py.
You don't have also any possibility to add custom configuration in running
the manifest, for each c
47 matches
Mail list logo