[openstack-dev] Stepping down as keystone core

coordinator for OpenStack. Let me know if you are interested on one of those things. Get in touch on #openstack-outreachy, #openstack-sdks or #openstack-keystone. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz (samueldmq) __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] Stepping down as coordinator for the Outreachy internships

Hi all, As someone who cares for this cause and participated twice in this program as a mentor, I'd like to candidate as program coordinator. Victoria, thanks for all your lovely work. You are awesome! Best regards, Samuel On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 6:51 PM Kendall Nelson wrote: > You have done

[openstack-dev] [keystone] PTL candidacy

our first PTG in Atlanta. I am looking forward to seeing you there! Thank you, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz - samueldmq [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424239/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Pike PTL

Hey Steve, Thanks for all your dedication, you've been a great leader! It's been a pleasure to serve keystone with you as PTL. Samuel On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Brad Topol wrote: > +1! Great job Steve > > > Brad Topol, Ph.D. > IBM Distinguished Engineer >

[openstack-dev] [keystone] PTL candidacy

workflows, and e) making the default RBAC authorization more granular. Thank you, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/369002/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] new core reviewer (rderose)

Ronald, congrats, well deserved! Welcome aboard! On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 11:56 AM, David Stanek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01 at 10:44 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > > > Thanks for all your hard work Ron, we sincerely appreciate it. > > > > Contrats! Well deserved for sure! >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][cinder] Projects acting as a domain at the top of the project hierarchy

Hi all, I discussed the change with other cores in -keystone and, looking at the API change guidelines, it should be an allowed API change. I had a doubt whether the rule "Changing or removing a property in a resource representation." could make it a forbidden API change or not. However, since

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] changes to keystone-core!

gt; immediately, we'd like to welcome the following new Guardians of the Gate > to keystone-core: > > + Dave Chen (davechen) > + Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz (samueldmq) > > Happy code reviewing! > > Steve Martinelli > OpenStack Keystone Project Team Lead > > __

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Let's get together and fix all the bugs

Hi, Thanks for the initiative, David. Putting more focus on solving bugs is a great idea, as it will both improve the stability of the project and help new contributors to get involved. Count me in! Regards, Samuel On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adam Young wrote: > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty FFE Request - Dynamic Policies

Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez