Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Stepping down from Release Management team

> On Oct 8, 2018, at 2:34 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Anne Bertucio writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have had a fantastic time getting to work on the Release Management >> team and getting to know you all through the release marketing work, >> however, it is time for me to step down from my

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [election] NON nomination for TC

> On Oct 3, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Sean Dague wrote: >> I'd like to announce that after 4 years serving on the OpenStack >> Technical Committee, I will not be running in this fall's >> election. Over the last 4 years we've navigated some rough seas

[openstack-dev] Sydney Forum Topic Submission

Hi, We have made it to the next stage of the topic selection process for the Forum in Sydney! At the Forum the entire OpenStack community (users and developers) gathers to brainstorm the requirements for the next release, gather feedback on the past version and have strategic discussions that go

[openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission

Hi Forum Brainstormers, Wow! Some great topics in the etherpads so far. This event is going to be amazing. We're less than a week away now from opening the "formal submission" part of the process. If you haven't already, please start prioritizing the top sessions from your list of ideas.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Shamail Tahir wrote: > > In the past, governance has helped (on the UC WG side) to reduce > > overlaps/duplication in WGs chartered for similar objectives. I would > > like to un

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Turning TC/UC workgroups into OpenStack SIGs

s. > Hope this clarifies, > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http

[openstack-dev] [Forum] Moderators needed!

Hi everyone, Most of the proposed/accepted Forum sessions currently have moderators but there are six sessions that do not have a confirmed moderator yet. Please look at the list below and let us know if you would be willing to help moderate any of these sessions. The topics look really

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

hat everyone stays in openstack-dev > for _all_ discussions (single-project as well). Only the most mundane > but necessary emails go on per-project "business lists". So there would > be zero point in ever subscribing to the business lists without also > subscribing to openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

n > established project team's business, and a complete waste of time to > even have to filter by thread. We've gotten _really_ wide over the > years. So if you have a better strategy to help newbies deal with that > and not get funneled into a silo _immediately_, do share. But for now, &

Re: [openstack-dev] [ux] Future of the OpenStack UX team

> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __

[openstack-dev] [ux] Poll for next team meeting

we determine a time. I will be closing the poll on Feb. 9th, 2017 @ 23:59 UTC. Poll: http://doodle.com/poll/76bnere6ztdg7hgd -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109622.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] establishing project-wide goals

on feedback) in the Product WG repo. We are currently working with the infra team to get a visualization tool deployed that shows the status for each artifact and provides links so that people can get more details as necessary. Could something similar be (re)used here? I also have a general question a

Re: [openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 05/02/2016 01:53 PM, Shamail Tahir wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> When will we name the P release of OpenStack? We named two releases >> simultaneously (Newton and Oc

[openstack-dev] Timeframe for naming the P release?

the location is now known) we would be able to have names associated with the current release cycle (Newton), N+1 (Ocata), and N+2 (P). This would also allow us to get back to only voting for one name per release cycle but consistently have names for N, N+1, and N+2. -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t

Re: [openstack-dev] Summit Core Party after Austin

rg?subject:unsubscribe > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [election][tc] TC Candidacy for Shamail Tahir

Hi everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for OpenStack Technical Committee member for the upcoming term. I am currently an offering manager for OpenStack initiatives at IBM and I have been involved in the OpenStack community since 2013. I spend most of my time[1] in our working groups

[openstack-dev] Encouraging first-time contributors through bug tags/reviews

4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Bug_Tags [5] http://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/ -- Thanks, Shamail Tahir t: @ShamailXD tz: Eastern Time __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscr

[openstack-dev] [tc] projects.yaml (project since data)

ble to add an "official-since" into projects.yaml? The value could tie to when the TC approves a project (since not all projects have to adhere with the 6-month release itself). [1] https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml -- Thanks, Shamail Ta

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] service catalog: TNG

Clint, consul does provide DNS-SD (but not DNS-TXT) interface so using it as a backend allows us to focus on REST but set ground work for DNS too. > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > > ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptl] Troubleshooting cross-project communications

> >> __ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

ffiliation tag (versus those that don't have it) and make them more "preferred" in a sense? Thanks, Shamail > - Josh > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.opens