- Original Message -
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:30 AM, Radcliffe, Mark wrote:
The problem with AGPL is that the scope is very uncertain and the
determination of the consequences are very fact intensive. I was the
chair of the User Committee in developing the GPLv3 and I
- Original Message -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I think this is really worthwhile to try -- and it might offer an
interesting, readable history of decisions made. Plus how funny it was also
brought up at the Ops Summit. Convergence, cool.
It
- Original Message -
Hi Steve,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2014 16:14:19 -0500 (EST)
Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote:
[SNIP]
My feeling both with my product hat and my upstream documentation
contributor hat on knowing some of the issues we've had there in the
past is that one release
- Original Message -
Hi, all
I search the current blueprints and old mails in the mail list, but find
nothing about Guest NUMA and setting memory binding policies.
I just find a blueprint about vcpu topology and a blueprint about CPU
binding.
- Original Message -
Howdy! I’m a Product Manager for Cloud Servers at Rackspace, and wanted to
add a bit to what Behrens is saying.
I'm a Product Manager covering OpenStack over at Red Hat - and largely
concentrating on Nova no less, so I'll jump in and provide the view from my
side
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming
On 02/05/2014 01:09 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:52 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Steve Gordon wrote:
From: Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com
Based on today's Technical Committee meeting
- Original Message -
From: Anne Gentle anne.gen...@rackspace.com
To: openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 5:24:44 PM
Subject: [Openstack-docs] Conventions on naming
Hi all,
Based on today's Technical Committee meeting and conversations with the
201 - 207 of 207 matches
Mail list logo