On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:41 AM, wrote:
> Hi Cathy,
>
> Cathy Zhang:
>>
>> I will tentatively set the meeting time to UTC 1700 ~ UTC 1800 Tuesday.
>> Hope this time is good for all people who have interest and like to
>> contribute to this work. We plan to start the first meeting on May 17.
>
>
considering trip recovery and japanese holiday,
this week's taas meeting is cancelled.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
reminder: the patch has been merged and we'll use the new time slot
from this week.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> it's my understanding too.
> i submitted the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304383/
> please +1 if you are ok.
>
> On
welcome, hirofumi!
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> It's been over a week.
> I'd like to welcome Hirofumi to the neutron core reviewer team!
>
> Akihiro
>
> 2016-04-08 13:34 GMT+09:00 Akihiro Motoki :
>> Hi Neutrinos,
>>
>> As the API Lieutenant of Neutron team,
>> I woul
gt;
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305604/
>
> Does that include a fix for your issue?
it includes Ic3046817b6c5808c61c4a3bc3d912501e6a52274 ,
which might fix my issue.
>
> -Josh
>
>
> Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> this version broke
hi,
this version broke networking-midonet gate jobs.
bug 1569680
bug 1570145
is there any chance to make another release with fixes?
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:46 PM, wrote:
> We are satisfied to announce the release of:
>
> pbr 1.9.0: Python Build Reasonableness
>
> With source available at:
>
it's my understanding too.
i submitted the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304383/
please +1 if you are ok.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Soichi Shigeta
wrote:
>
> Hi Anil, Vinay, and folks,
>
> I'd like to confirm the start time of weekly TaaS IRC meeting
> will be changed fro
+1
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi Neutrinos,
>
> As the API Lieutenant of Neutron team,
> I would like to propose Hirofumi Ichihara (irc: hichihara) as a member of
> Neutron core reviewer team mainly focuing on the API/DB area.
>
> Hirofumi has been contributing neutro
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
> Migration script has been submitted, v1 is not going anywhere from
> stable/liberty or stable/mitaka, so it’s about to disappear from master.
>
> I’m thinking in this order:
>
> - remove jenkins jobs
> - wait for heat to remove their jenkins
hi,
currently our gate is suffering from multiple issues.
the following steps are necessary to fix them without disabling gate jobs:
1. merge this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290946/
2. wait for a fwaas fix being merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290983/
(or bug 124 fixed in t
hi,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>> Henry,
>>
>> i think it's better to fix model vs migration mismatch issues [1]
>> before tagging.
>> how do you think?
>
> I agree that [1] should be included in Mi
Henry,
i think it's better to fix model vs migration mismatch issues [1]
before tagging.
how do you think?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287016/
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Henry Gessau wrote:
> By tomorrow we intend to tag the heads of all the neutron alembic branches
> with the MI
bab already
> checked.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/openstack/neutron-fwaas/blob/master/neutron_fwaas/servic
> es/firewall/drivers/linux/iptables_fwaas.py#L120
>
> Thanks
>
> Sridar
>
>
> On 1/26/16, 2:15 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
>
>>hi,
>&g
hi,
what a firewall with admin_state_up=False should do?
my intuition says such a firewall should pass all traffic. (same as no firewall)
but the reference implementation seems to block everything. (same as a
firewall without any rules)
i wrote a tempest test case (test_firewall_disable_rule) mirr
hi,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Small update on the RFE. It was approved for Mitaka, assuming we come up
> with proper details upfront thru neutron-specs process.
>
> In the meantime, we have found more use cases for flow management among
> features in develo
ving it [1] and then we can iterate over and improve.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256210/
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
>
> Thanks,
> Fawad Khaliq
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Galo Navarro wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I think the goal of this split is well explained by Sandro in the first
>> mails of the chain:
>>
>> 1. Downstream packaging
>> 2. Tagging the delivery properly as a library
>> 3. Adding as a project on pypi
>
> Not really, because (
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Guillermo Ontañón
wrote:
> Hi Sandro,
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Sandro Mathys wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Takashi Yamamoto raised in another thread [0], python-midonetclient
>> should be split out into its own repo
>
hi,
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Doug Wiegley
wrote:
>
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>>
>>> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>>
>>> if i move fwaas tests from neutron to neutron-fwaas, [1]
>>> i
hi,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Soichi Shigeta
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We find a problem that neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows.
>
> o) Problem description:
>
> Background:
> At Liberty, a bug fix to drop only old flows was merged
> to Neutron.
> When ovs-agent is re
hi,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Sandro Mathys wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to prepare moving our repos to the OpenStack infrastructure, I
> got reminded just how many repos we have in our GitHub organization
> [1] - and how many of those seem to be deprecated or tangential.
>
> Now, do we stil
hi,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi Neutrinos,
>
> I would like to share a proposal with you on how we could scale our
> ever-growing testing needs, and at the same time, provide guidance to the
> developers who care about the quality of the work they produce, and how they
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
wrote:
> hi,
>
> we are going to migrate networking-midonet meeting from slack to irc.
> the plan is to have it 7:00 UTC on every Tuesdays.
> if you are interested but have a different time preference,
> please speak up.
> t
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ivan Kelly wrote:
>>
>> +1 for #2
>
>
> PS: Beware of the top-posting! It makes vote counting harder ;-)
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Sandro Mathys
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Our
hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Any plan to revive this [1] so we can discuss and finalize the use cases and
> APIs.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96149/
i think Anil will explain the history of the project.
i suspect neutron-spec isn't appropria
hi,
we are going to migrate networking-midonet meeting from slack to irc.
the plan is to have it 7:00 UTC on every Tuesdays.
if you are interested but have a different time preference,
please speak up.
thank you.
__
OpenStack
://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html
>
> Fawad Khaliq
here's an instruction in case you can read japanese. :-)
https://github.com/osrg/ryu-neutron-zuul-ci/blob/master/doc/install.ja.txt
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>
> Regards,
> Vikram Hosakote
> vhosa...@cisco.com
> Software Engineer
> Cloud and Virtualization Group (CVG)
> Cisco Systems
> Boxborough MA USA
>
> From: Takashi Yamamoto
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
hi,
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:00 AM, Fawad Khaliq wrote:
> Folks,
>
> What would be the mechanism to enable a third party CI on a Neutron
> sub-project? I am not sure if anyone has already tried it.
networking-ofagent has its third party CI running.
you can ask kakuma for details.
>
> I am inte
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have no idea why the link is broken.
probabaly meeting_id given to #startmeeting was wrong?
>
> today's meeting log is here:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tap_as_a_service_meeting/2015/tap_as
at some past meeting logs (including
> from today), but the 'past meetings' link at
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Tap_as_a_Service_Meeting does not work for me.
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Takashi Yamamoto [mailto:yamam...@midok
hi,
tap-as-a-service meeting will be held weekly, starting today.
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Tap_as_a_Service_Meeting
anyone interested in the project is welcome.
sorry for immediate notice.
__
OpenStack Development Mail
hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
> Hey Akihiro,
>
> Thanks for arranging this. I did not see any link to RSVP.
> I would love to attend this event - please add me to the list.
at this point just go to the venue is fine.
here's a RSVP link in case you still want to regi
i missed the "further notice"?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We are in the last hours of Liberty, let's pause for a second and consider
> merging patches only if absolutely necessary. The gate is getting clogged
> and we need to give priority to potential RC3
hi,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> On 16 Oct 2015, at 10:50, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> if i move fwaas tests from neutron to neutron-fwaas, [1]
>> is there easy way to run them together with the rest of neutron api tests
>>
hi,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Matthew Treinish
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:02:22AM -0400, Assaf Muller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
>>>
hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:02:22AM -0400, Assaf Muller wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Takashi Yamamoto
>> wrote:
>>
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > i'm looking in fwaas
east.
how do you think?
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/236762/
>
> German
>
> On 10/16/15, 1:50 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>
>>On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Matthew Treinish
>>wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:25
hi,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:25:40PM +0900, Takashi Yamamoto wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i'm looking in fwaas tempest tests and have a question about code location.
>>
>> currently,
>>
>> -
hi,
we are planing to have a social meetup for neutron developers
on Thursday evening.
anyone who are interested in neutron development are welcome.
the place is not fixed yet. we want to estimate how many people want to go.
please fill in the following RSVP if you are interested. sooner is bet
hi,
i'm looking in fwaas tempest tests and have a question about code location.
currently,
- fwaas api tests and its rest client are in neutron repo
- there are no fwaas scenario tests
eventually,
- fwaas api tests should be moved into neutron-fwaas repo
- fwaaa scenario tests should be in neu
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> On 05 Oct 2015, at 15:32, Gary Kotton wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/5/15, 3:21 AM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote:
>>
On 04 Oct 2015, at 19:21, Gary Kotton wrote:
Sorry, it is not a result of the AZ support (humble apologies)
>>
hi,
you removed networking-midonet tempest jobs for the reason. [1]
i want to revive them. but i'm not sure what methods are acceptable or not.
can you explain a little?
i did some research of other repos.
- networking-ovn seems to use a raw "git clone" command to fetch
openvswitch repo
- networ
hi,
what's the status of patches like this?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173834/
we still haven't decided how to handle that?
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-req
it seems two kinds of sub projects.
one is vendor plugins, for which option #1 seems appropriate.
another is things like l2gw and octavia, for which option #2 might
make more sense.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> After some consultation with Doug and Thierry, we've boiled
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Takashi Yamamoto
> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> > The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1] is m
hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1] is moving
> release management tasks for the networking-foo projects into alignment with
> other Neutron libraries. There is value in having this consolidated into a
> single p
thank you all.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome to the team!
>
> Edgar
>
> From: Kevin Benton
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Maili
101 - 148 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
