On 5/19/14 12:35 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On May 19, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:26:22PM +, Tim Schnell wrote:
Hi Nilakhya,
As Randall mentioned we did discuss this exact issue at the summit. I
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/explode-nested-resources
Spec: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/explode-resource-list
Tim
On 5/19/14 1:53 PM, Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 5/19/14 12:35 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On May 19
On 1/15/14 9:01 AM, Liz Blanchard lsure...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 4:41 AM, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
My bad, the image cannot be viewed.
Upload again.
Thanks,
Jay
2014/1/9 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com
Hi,
Now when using OpenStack dashboard to launch a
On 12/23/13 5:02 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 12/20/2013 04:39 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 12/19/2013 04:45 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Sid has Django 1.6. Is it planned to add support for it? I currently
don't know what to do with the Horizon package, as it's currently
On 12/6/13 4:32 PM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
I hope I'm not re-opening worm cans here, and that's not my intent, but I
just wanted to get a little clarification in-line below:
On Dec 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com
wrote:
To resolve
On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2013-12-05 08:35:12 -0800:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Monty
On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message of 2013-12-05 09:49:03 -0800:
On 12/5/13 11:33 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
wrote:
Excerpts from James Slagle's
The original intention was to propose the Heater functionality as part of Heat.
I would just like to clarify that having Heater as a separate project is not
because of the impact of the gerrit reviews. The proposal for a separate Core
team or sub-project team was to solve the impact on reviews.
Hi Heaters,
We would like to start a dialog on the general direction of the proposed Heater
project:
blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/heat-template-repo
wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/htr
It is important to us to start the discussion early but please note that
Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message on 27.11.2013 00:44:04:
From: Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 27.11.2013 00:47
Subject: Re: [openstack
On 11/27/13 10:39 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 23:44, Tim Schnell wrote:
A template-validate call would need to return all the group and
ordering
information, but otherwise heat can ignore this extra data.
I agree with all of your modifications, although bringing up
On 11/27/13 10:09 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 22:24, Tim Schnell wrote:
Use Case #1
I see valid value in being able to group templates based on a type or
+1, me too.
keyword. This would allow any client, Horizon or a Template Catalog
service, to better organize
database?
Tim Schnell
Software Developer
Rackspace
On 11/27/13 10:53 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks, that clarified the use case a bit. Bot looking at the use case
now,
isn't this stack tagging instead of template tagging?
I.e. assume that for each stack a user
input text area
or via file upload.
Tim
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Tim Schnell [tim.schn...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:24 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat
stacks later?
Regards,
Thomas
Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.commailto:tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote
on 27.11.2013 16:24:18:
From: Tim Schnell
tim.schn...@rackspace.commailto:tim.schn...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
On 11/27/13 1:17 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 27/11/13 18:16, Tim Schnell wrote:
On 11/27/13 10:09 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 22:24, Tim Schnell wrote:
Use Case #1
I see valid value in being able to group templates based on a type or
+1, me too
On 11/27/13 4:12 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/28/2013 05:09 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 26/11/13 22:24, Tim Schnell wrote:
Use Case #1
I see valid value in being able to group templates based on a type or
+1, me too.
keyword. This would allow any client, Horizon
I have created the following wiki with all of the related use cases that
have been discussed in this thread as well as where I think we have
currently landed on the actual implementation for these use cases.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/UI
I know that the first use case in particular,
So the originally question that I attempted to pose was, Can we add a
schema-less metadata section to the template that can be used for a
variety of purposes?. It looks like the answer is no, we need to discuss
the features that would go in the metadata section and add them to the HOT
@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements
roadmap
On 11/27/2013 11:02 AM, Christopher Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tim Schnell
tim.schn
On 11/26/13 4:16 PM, Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/27/2013 10:24 AM, Tim Schnell wrote:
So the originally question that I attempted to pose was, Can we add a
schema-less metadata section to the template that can be used for a
variety of purposes?. It looks like the answer
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Tim Schnell
tim.schn...@rackspace.commailto:tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote:
From: Christopher Armstrong
chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
On 11/26/13 5:24 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/11/13 22:55 +, Tim Schnell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Tim Schnell
tim.schn...@rackspace.commailto:tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote:
From: Christopher Armstrong
chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr
Hi Steve,
As one of the UI developers driving the requirements behind these new
blueprints I wanted to take a moment to assure you and the rest of the
Openstack community that the primary purpose of pushing these requirements
out to the community is to help improve the User Experience for Heat
Hi Edgar,
It seems like this blueprint is related more to building an api that
manages a network topology more than one that needs to build out the
dependencies between resources to help create the network topology. If we
are talking about just an api to save, duplicate, and share these
network
Hey Liz,
I briefly brought up horizontal navigation in the IRC meeting last week. I
agree, first of all, that Left Nav will run into scaling issues at some point
but I think Gabriel Hurley made a good point in that doing something as drastic
as getting rid of the Left Nav and replacing it with
Most of my navigation related issues can be summed up into 3 problems.
1. Not having a secondary level of navigation in the left-nav really
restricts the level of granularity that can be achieved through the navigation.
Having an accordion-like nav structure would help this as well as
Hey everyone,
Just a quick demo of the Resource Topology. I'm working on getting it into Code
Review for Horizon either today or tomorrow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe9EM8WhLPA
Thanks!
[cid:F8A7CDE7-7AE1-42CB-A834-D228A925FF7A]
inline:
28 matches
Mail list logo
