[openstack-dev] [openstack][zuul] About devstack plugin orders and the log to contain the running local.conf

Hi, everyone I am trying to migrate tacker's functional CI job into new zuul v3 framework, but it seems: 1. the devstack plugin order is not the one I specified in the .zuull.yaml https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516004/4/.zuul.yaml:I have:   devstack_plugins: heat: 

[openstack-dev] [tacker]

Hi Sridhar, You said in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255146/ we should not expose the infra_driver and mgmt_driver to user,but they have been already exposed by API at  https://github.com/openstack/tacker/blob/master/tacker/extensions/vnfm.py#L205, so what do you think?Do we need remove the

[openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] what does policy rule action redirect do

hi, I have followed the steps athttps://github.com/openstack/group-based-policy/blob/master/gbpservice/tests/contrib/devstack/exercises/gbp_servicechain.sh and I can see the firewall and lb are created right. But I thought the vm client-1's traffic will be redirected to firewall, lb and last to

[openstack-dev] [Group-based-policy] do we have any usage doc about service function chaining feature?

Hi,I failed to find any usage doc about GBP project's SFC feature.Could any one please help to point me to the location? Thanksyong sheng gong__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [networking-ovn] ovn-northd is a spof

hi,I know everyone want to provide there own neutron implementation, networking-ovn is one of themRegard this, I read some architecture doc of it, SPOF in OVN way exists in two place:1. ovn-northd, I don't know if we can run multiple ones, but the arch doc demos only one2. north db and south

[openstack-dev] [nova] where the aggregate and cell document is

Hi stackers,I want to set up cell and aggregator env, but I failed to find the document about them.could you please help me to find the document? regards,yong sheng gong__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [neutron] subnetallocation is in core resource, while there is a extension for it?

Hi, neutron guys,look at https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/extensions/subnetallocation.py,which defines an extension Subnetallocation but defines no extension resource. Actually, it is implementedin core resource.So I think we should remove this extension. I filed a bug

[openstack-dev] 答复：horizon failed due to django compressor

pyscss lower than 1.3:gongysh@localhost:/opt/stack/neutron$ sudo pip freeze | grep -i pyscss django-pyscss==1.0.6 pyScss==1.2.1 --发件人：gong_ys2004 gong_ys2...@aliyun.com发送时间：2014年11月14日(星期五) 09:13收件人：OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] horizon failed due to django compressor

Hi, I installed the devstack on my fedora 20 system, the process seems good because I have seen the normal output of the stack.sh: Horizon is now available at http://192.168.88.225/ Keystone is serving at http://192.168.88.225:5000/v2.0/ Examples on using novaclient command line is in exercise.sh