Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][vpnaas]

2018-03-22 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
subnets to the existing vpnaas connection so that the newly entered subnets can communicate using the vpnaas connection which is already there. Best Regards, vidyadhar reddy On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 3:54 AM, hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com<mailto:hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com> mailto:hoan...@vn.fujit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][vpnaas]

2018-03-20 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi, IIUC, your use case is to connect 4 subnets from different sites (2 subnets for each site). If so, did you try with endpoint group? If not, please refer the following docs for more detail about how to try and get more understanding [1][2] [1] https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/admin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] drivers removal

2018-02-27 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi, Following the announced information by Takashi Yamamoto [1]. I have proposed a patch to remove the following drivers [2]: - CiscoCsrIPsecDriver - FedoraStrongSwanDriver - VyattaIPsecDriver Those drivers are intended to be removed in Rocky. So, please check it and leave comment if you still n

[openstack-dev] [legal-discuss] [neutron] License issue & Need help

2017-07-25 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi, We are recently trying to propose a Netlink solution [1] in order to improve performance for Neutron's Security Group. Almost the thing is ready to go except for license issue as we are not so familiar with this area. The problem is come from some parts of code we used that based on MIT lice

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [vpnaas] Contribution in order to bring VPNaaS back into the neutron governance

2017-03-15 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi everyone, As you know that the project neutron-vpnaas is no longer part of the neutron governance in Ocata [1][2]. I am planning/working to address the gaps identified in [2] in order to bring it back into the neutron governance. And according to the information from Kevin's email [3] (PTG su

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature to L-3 milestone

2015-09-10 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Good day Germy, >I have reviewed the specification linked above. Thank you for introducing >such an interesting and important feature. But as I commented inline, I >think it still need some further work to do. Such as how to get those logs >stored? To admin and tenant, I think it's different. >And

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-21 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Good day, >> The specification and source codes will definitely reviewing/filing in next >> week. >> #link >> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/network >> ing_fwaas.2015-08-19-23.59.log.html > > No - I did not say "definitely" - nowhere in that IRC log was that word us

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread hoan...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi Kye Mestery [PTL], CC: Sean M. Collins [FWaaS chair], CC: All, According to the last FWaaS IRC weekly meeting, the "Logging API for SG and FW rules" feature will be reviewed and handled by FWaaS core team. #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_fwaas/2015/networking_fwaas.20