Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

2017-05-25 Thread joehuang
-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness I'd like to fill in a little more context here. I see three options with the current two proposals. Option 1 Use a special admin project to denote elevated privileges. For those unfamiliar with the approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

2017-05-24 Thread Adrian Turjak
On 25/05/17 07:47, Lance Bragstad wrote: > *Option 2* > > Implement global role assignments in keystone. > / > / > /How it works:/ > / > / > Role assignments in keystone can be scoped to global context. Users > can then ask for a globally scoped token > > Pros: > - This approach represents a

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

2017-05-24 Thread Lance Bragstad
I'd like to fill in a little more context here. I see three options with the current two proposals. *Option 1* Use a special admin project to denote elevated privileges. For those unfamiliar with the approach, it would rely on every deployment having an "admin" project defined in configuration

[openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

2017-05-24 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hey all, To date we have two proposed solutions for tackling the admin-ness issue we have across the services. One builds on the existing scope concepts by scoping to an admin project [0]. The other introduces global role assignments [1] as a way to denote elevated privileges. I'd like to get