Ok, that sounds like it would do what you want. Thanks for clarifying. :-)
Doug
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote:
Doug,
Sorry for confusing you with 'local' term. I meant that collector is up on
the node which is one of the Galera-nodes. Data
Hi guys,
I decided to forward this message to dev list too. On the previous week I
was investigating Ceilometer performance. And this letter is a brief
description of my results.
Lab description:
3 controllers
187 computes
HA: Galera for MySQL
memcached is on, RabbitMQ in HA mode
Ceilometer
On Tue, Dec 10 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi Nadya,
Guys, if you have any questions or comments you are welcome! I think that
2x difference between avg time in empty lab and 5 sec polling scenario
is not a bad result. But 100 instances that were being monitored during the
test is not a
Nadya, Julien,
We are working around profiling system based on logs. This will allows us
to detect bottlenecks.
We should make a couple of small patches in each project to support
profiling.
As we are going to be well integrated with OpenStack infrastructure we are
going to use Ceilometer as a
Julien,
Yes, I use the same SQL for Nova and Ceilometer. Thanks for pointing this
out. My bad, I didn't take it into account. So if we want to use Ceilometer
+ MySQL in production (in theory :) ) we need to use separate controllers
with Ceilometer's MySQL only. And each controller may run it's
On Tue, Dec 10 2013, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Yes, I use the same SQL for Nova and Ceilometer. Thanks for pointing this
out. My bad, I didn't take it into account. So if we want to use Ceilometer
+ MySQL in production (in theory :) ) we need to use separate controllers
with Ceilometer's MySQL
