On Tue, Aug 13 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I was curious about why we went for a JOIN here rather than just using the
meter table initially?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L336-L391.
Doug had mentioned that some performance testing had
On 8/14/13 3:26 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
I was curious about why we went for a JOIN here rather than just using
the
meter table initially?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/im
On Wed, Aug 14 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
Ahhh yep, when I look at the two side-by-side I can see what you're
saying. Thanks for the explanation!
So, then should I write up a BP for improvements of this sort, like the
API improvement one? It seems like we may get better results if the SQL
Hey team,
I was curious about why we went for a JOIN here rather than just using the
meter table initially?
https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/blob/master/ceilometer/storage/impl_sqlalchemy.py#L336-L391.
Doug had mentioned that some performance testing had gone on with some of
these
