Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

2013-11-22 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Gordon Chung chu...@ca.ibm.com wrote: In all cases, these are free string fields. `user_id' and `project_id' map to Keystone _most of the time_, i'm sort of torn between the two -- which is why i brought it up i guess. i like the flexibility of having

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

2013-11-21 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, Nov 20 2013, Gordon Chung wrote: came across a question when reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56019... basically, in Samples, user_id and project_id attributes are pretty self-explanatory and map to Keystone concepts pretty well but what is the criteria for setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

2013-11-21 Thread Gordon Chung
In all cases, these are free string fields. `user_id' and `project_id' map to Keystone _most of the time_, i'm sort of torn between the two -- which is why i brought it up i guess. i like the flexibility of having resource as a free string field but the difference between resource and

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] meaning of resource_id in a meter

2013-11-20 Thread Gordon Chung
hi, for reference, this is a continuation of discussion from meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-11-20-21.00.log.html (see #topic what's a resource?) came across a question when reviewing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56019... basically, in