Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

On 01/31/2016 10:43 PM, dong.wenj...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I proposed the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz in Ciner[1]. > > Project doctor[2] in OPNFV community is its upstream. > The goal of this project is to build fault management and > maintenance framework for high

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

Hi Dulko, A VIM can't not detect certain NFVI fault. The external systems don't monitor the servise state. Fault as CPU failure, CPU condition not OK, Memory failure and network card failure, e.g. If the external systems detect the storage controller failure, Live migration if storage is still

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

Hi all, I proposed the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz in Ciner[1]. Project doctor[2] in OPNFV community is its upstream. The goal of this project is to build fault management and maintenance framework for high availability of Network Services on top of virtualized

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

Hi, dong.wenjuan Sounds very interesting about "doctor" project. What's timezone about the weekly meeting? I want to join it if I have time by then. Thanks Wang Hao 2016-02-01 14:43 GMT+08:00 : > > Hi all, > > I proposed the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz Hi, dong.wenjuan Sounds very interesting about "doctor" project. What's timezone about the weekly meeting? I want to join it if I have time by then. Thanks Wang Hao 2016-02-01 14:43 GMT+08:00 <dong.wenj...@zte.com.cn<