t for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Friday, March 28, 2014 at 12:52 PM
To:
"openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder
On Fri, 2014-03-28 at 18:16 +, Duncan Thomas wrote:
> On 28 March 2014 14:38, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the
> > taskflow persistence backend.
> >
> > Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence
> > m
On 28 March 2014 14:38, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the
> taskflow persistence backend.
>
> Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence
> method for most usages) and then after this works there can be discus
An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the taskflow
persistence backend.
Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence
method for most usages) and then after this works there can be discussion
around moving those tables to something like My
Hello everyone,
Currently I am working on adding persistence layer for create_volume api using
taskflow.
Could you please give your opinions on whether is it a good idea to add
taskflow tables in existing cinder database or to create a new database for
taskflow.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhishek Ke
