One more note I missed in the previous email.
On Jul 15, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Ben Nemec
> wrote:
I think this probably makes sense, but some more thoughts inline.
On 07/15/2016 03:13 PM, Stephane Miller wrote:
To better support
A few notes inline; I'm not the best technical contact for IPA+DIB integration,
but going to add a little bit of context here so you all can well-understand
our goals.
On Jul 15, 2016, at 4:28 PM, Gregory Haynes
> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016, at
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016, at 03:46 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> I think this probably makes sense, but some more thoughts inline.
>
> On 07/15/2016 03:13 PM, Stephane Miller wrote:
> > To better support diskimage-builder based IPA images going forward, we'd
> > like to move the ironic-agent element into
I think this probably makes sense, but some more thoughts inline.
On 07/15/2016 03:13 PM, Stephane Miller wrote:
> To better support diskimage-builder based IPA images going forward, we'd
> like to move the ironic-agent element into the ironic-python-agent
> repository. This will involve:
>
> -
To better support diskimage-builder based IPA images going forward, we'd
like to move the ironic-agent element into the ironic-python-agent
repository. This will involve:
- Improving support for having multiple copies of an element, so that we
may deprecate the diskimage-builder repository copy