m: Fausto Marzi
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 5:22 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Freezer] Replace G
ay, May 18, 2016 at 5:22 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Freezer] Replace Gnu Tar with DAR
>Hi Deklan,
>
>what happen if the extract is executed without --listed-incremental or
>--incremental options?
rote:
>
> >Whats the issue?
> >____________
> >From: Dieterly, Deklan [deklan.diete...@hpe.com]
> >Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:07 PM
> >To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> >Subject: [openstack-dev] [Freezer] Replace Gnu
terly, Deklan [deklan.diete...@hpe.com]
>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:07 PM
>To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>Subject: [openstack-dev] [Freezer] Replace Gnu Tar with DAR
>
>Does anybody see any issues if Freezer used DAR instead of Gnu Tar? DAR
>seems to handle a particular use case
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Dieterly, Deklan
wrote:
> Does anybody see any issues if Freezer used DAR instead of Gnu Tar? DAR
> seems to handle a particular use case that Freezer has while Gnu Tar does
> not.
> --
> Deklan Dieterly
>
> Senior Systems Software Engineer
> HPE
>
>
> ___
Whats the issue?
From: Dieterly, Deklan [deklan.diete...@hpe.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:07 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Freezer] Replace Gnu Tar with DAR
Does anybody see any issues if Freezer used DAR instead
Does anybody see any issues if Freezer used DAR instead of Gnu Tar? DAR
seems to handle a particular use case that Freezer has while Gnu Tar does
not.
--
Deklan Dieterly
Senior Systems Software Engineer
HPE
__
OpenStack Dev
