others.
>>> > saying libvirt makes people have to know that when you say libvirt you
>>> > mean
>>> > just the qemu/kvm that nova supports using the implementation detail of
>>> > using libvirt.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
> wrote:
> > What about hypervisor "Qemu", and checkbox option on Settings tab -
> > "Use KVM extension"?
> Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing.
> I think "Libvirt" + some tooltip which says "Qemu and
015 7:32 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt
> on Wizard
>
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
>> <ik
).
-Original Message-
From: Bob Ball [mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 7:32 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt
on Wizard
> On Mo
org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt
on Wizard
> Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing.
It looks like hypervisor much more than libvirt. Moreover, according to
Wikipedia [1] (don't blame me guys) Qemu is Type-2 hypervisor.
ova supports using the implementation detail of
> using libvirt.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> From: Aleksandr Didenko [adide...@mirantis.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 4:16 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subj
ay, December 18, 2015 4:16 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt
> on
> > Wizard
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > looks good to me.
> >
> > Regar
people have to know that when you say libvirt you
>> > mean
>> > just the qemu/kvm that nova supports using the implementation detail of
>> > using libvirt.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Kevin
>> > ________________
>> > From: Aleksandr
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt
on Wizard
+1 to Andrey
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Andrey Danin <ada...@mirantis.com> wrote:
I sug
option).
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Ball [mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 7:32 AM
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> > Su
Hi fuelers,
We want to throw KVM/QEMU options from Wizard and instead of them leave
only one: Libvirt [0]. Libvirt option enables QEMU by default and there are
still be possibility to change it on KVM in settings. It looks more
logically because both QEMU\KVM are options for libvirt which manage
Hi,
looks good to me.
Regards,
Alex
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Andriy Popovych
wrote:
> Hi fuelers,
>
> We want to throw KVM/QEMU options from Wizard and instead of them leave
> only one: Libvirt [0]. Libvirt option enables QEMU by default and there are
> still
of using libvirt.
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Aleksandr Didenko [adide...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 4:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on
Wizard
13 matches
Mail list logo