Folks,
First, let me report current feature status: we continued the work with
Bogdan Dobrelya and Sergii Golovatiuk. I have incorporated their feedback
into the change. Also, I have fully tested it on custom ISO and Fuel CI
passes successfully. Also, I have an approval from Bogdan on the
Hey Dmitry,
Despite the fact the feature promises performance boost (IIUC) and
it's really nice to have it, I agree with Mike's opinion - it's late
to continue working on features. Each delay means less time to test
it, and we need to focus on quality.
I'm sorry, but I have to say "No" on
Hi Dmitry,
as much as I support the change, and glad that we got time for it, my
opinion is that we should not extend a FFE. I have following reasons to
think this way:
1) Feature Freeze is time based milestone, with the rational "FF ensures
that sufficient share of the ReleaseCycle is dedicated
Hello folks,
I'd like to request extension of current FFE for the feature [1]. During
the three FFE days we merged the spec [2] after big discussion and made a
couple iterations over the implementation [3]. We had a chat with Bogdan on
how to progress and here are the action items still need to
Hello Dmitry,
I like this idea and very much appreciate it.
+1 from me :)
A.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov <
dmescherya...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'd like to request extension of current FFE for the feature [1]. During
> the three FFE days we merged the
