Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

2017-06-23 Thread gordon chung
On 23/06/17 03:08 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > The quantity of metrics is very low. I'm not sure that batch_size works. > Regarding the batch_timeout. What will be when the timeout reached ? Will > ceilometer throw error to the log file and > discard the whole batch ? I've got this timeout

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

2017-06-23 Thread mate200
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 22:57 +, gordon chung wrote: > > On 22/06/17 04:23 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Hello everyone ! > > > > I'm sorry that I'm disturbing you, but I was sent here from > > openstack-operators ML. > > On my Mitaka test stack I installed Gnocchi as database for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

2017-06-22 Thread gordon chung
On 22/06/17 04:23 PM, mate...@mailbox.org wrote: > Hello everyone ! > > I'm sorry that I'm disturbing you, but I was sent here from > openstack-operators ML. > On my Mitaka test stack I installed Gnocchi as database for measurements, but > I have problems with > api part. Firstly, I ran it

[openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Difference between Gnocchi-api and uwsgi

2017-06-22 Thread mate200
Hello everyone ! I'm sorry that I'm disturbing you, but I was sent here from openstack-operators ML. On my Mitaka test stack I installed Gnocchi as database for measurements, but I have problems with api part. Firstly, I ran it directly executing gnocchi-api -p 8041. I noted the warning