On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com
wrote:
A way to achieve the same behavior as you suggest but less verbose would be
to use relationships in HOT. We had some discussion about relationships
earlier this year and in other contexts, but this would fit
Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com wrote on 03.10.2013 09:59:02:
From: Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 03.10.2013 10:01
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:07 PM
Hi all,
There is a small but important part of the autoscale design described in
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/AutoScaling that we'd like to discuss
to make sure everybody is on the same page. Namely, the relationship
between an autoscaling group and a load balancer.
In the current
Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com wrote on 02.10.2013 17:06:48:
From: Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 02.10.2013 17:09
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers
Hi all,
There is a small
