Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-14 Thread Anant Patil
On 09-Jan-15 19:19, Zane Bitter wrote: On 09/01/15 01:07, Angus Salkeld wrote: I am not in favor of the --continue as an API. I'd suggest responding to resource timeouts and if there is no response from the task, then re-start (continue) the task. Yeah, I am not in favour of a new API

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-09 Thread Steven Hardy
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:07:51PM +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Murugan, Visnusaran visnusaran.muru...@hp.com wrote: Steve, A My reasoning to have a a**--continuea** like functionality was to run it as a periodic task and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-09 Thread Zane Bitter
On 09/01/15 01:07, Angus Salkeld wrote: I am not in favor of the --continue as an API. I'd suggest responding to resource timeouts and if there is no response from the task, then re-start (continue) the task. Yeah, I am not in favour of a new API either. In fact, I believe we already have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-08 Thread vishnu
Steve, Auto recovery is the plan. Engine failure should be detected by way of heartbeat or recover partially realised stack on engine startup in case of a single engine scenario. --continue command was just a additional helper api. [image: --] Visnusaran Murugan [image:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-08 Thread Murugan, Visnusaran
to realize a partially completed stack. Your thoughts. From: vishnu [mailto:ckmvis...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 9, 2015 10:08 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence Steve, Auto recovery

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
completed stack. Your thoughts. *From:* vishnu [mailto:ckmvis...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Friday, January 9, 2015 10:08 AM *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence Steve, Auto recovery

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-08 Thread Steven Hardy
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:53:02PM +0530, vishnu wrote: Hi Zane, I was wondering if we could push changes relating to backup stack removal and to not load resources as part of stack. There needs to be a capability to restart jobs left over by dead engines.A something like heat

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Precursor to Phase 1 Convergence

2015-01-08 Thread vishnu
Hi Zane, I was wondering if we could push changes relating to backup stack removal and to not load resources as part of stack. There needs to be a capability to restart jobs left over by dead engines. something like heat stack-operation --continue [git rebase --continue] Had a chat with shady