Excerpts from Simon Pasquier's message of 2013-10-03 07:12:51 -0700:
> Hi Clint,
>
> Thanks for the reply! I'll update the bug you raised with more
> information. In the meantime, I agree with you that cfn-hup is enough
> for now.
>
> BTW, is there any bug or missing feature that would prevent
Hi Clint,
Thanks for the reply! I'll update the bug you raised with more
information. In the meantime, I agree with you that cfn-hup is enough
for now.
BTW, is there any bug or missing feature that would prevent me from
replacing cfn-hup by os-collect-config?
Simon
Le 20/09/2013 22:12, Cl
Hi Christopher,
Thanks for replying! I've been out last week hence this late email.
Le 20/09/2013 21:22, Christopher Armstrong a écrit :
Hello Simon! I've put responses below.
I'm kind of confused about your examples though, because you don't show
anything that depends on ComputeReady in your
Excerpts from Simon Pasquier's message of 2013-09-17 05:57:58 -0700:
> Hello,
>
> I'm testing stack updates with instance group and wait conditions and
> I'd like to get feedback from the Heat community.
>
> My template declares an instance group resource with size = N and a wait
> condition re
Hello Simon! I've put responses below.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Simon Pasquier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm testing stack updates with instance group and wait conditions and I'd
> like to get feedback from the Heat community.
>
> My template declares an instance group resource with size = N an
Hello,
I'm testing stack updates with instance group and wait conditions and
I'd like to get feedback from the Heat community.
My template declares an instance group resource with size = N and a wait
condition resource with count = N (N being passed as a parameter of the
template). Each grou
