+1 here. While the exact library choice may still be a topic for the
discussion, unit tests clearly shouldn't hardcode html stings inside, it is
too fragile.
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 at 02:00, Diana Whitten wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I'm absolutely with you ... I've been bitten by
Richard,
I'm absolutely with you ... I've been bitten by these very tests recently
when changing a class in a simple template. If anyone wants to override
these templates in the future, then they are forced to fight this
'expected_string' test as well.
I think this is a good idea.
- Diana
On