Hi Ironic folks, hi Devananda!
I'd like to share with you my thoughts on asynchronous API, which is
spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94923
First I was planned this as comments to the review, but it proved to be
much larger, so I post it for discussion on ML.
Here is list of different
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Ironic folks, hi Devananda!
I'd like to share with you my thoughts on asynchronous API, which is
spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94923
First I was planned this as comments to the review, but it proved to be
Hi All,
You've raised a good discussion, something similar already was started back
in february. Could someone please find the long etherpad with discussion
between Deva and Lifeless, as I recall most of the points mentioned above
have a good comments there.
Up to this point I have the only idea
BTW a very similar discussion is going in Neutron community right now,
please find a thread under the *[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Introducing task
oriented workflows* label.
Best regards,
Max Lobur,
Python Developer, Mirantis, Inc.
Mobile: +38 (093) 665 14 28
Skype: max_lobur
38, Lenina ave.
While I appreciate the many ideas being discussed here (some of which we've
explored previously and agreed to continue exploring), there is a
fundamental difference vs. what I propose in that spec. I believe that what
I'm proposing will be achievable without any significant visible changes in
the
