Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

Sorry for 1 day delay in response - busy prepping for Kolla midcycle next week. Responses inline. On 2/5/16, 12:14 PM, "Steve Gordon" wrote: >- Original Message - >> From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" >> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

- Original Message - > From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > > Steve, > > Comments inline > > On 2/3/16, 3:08 PM, "Steve Gordon" wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

eve [1] https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spin-kickstarts.git [2] https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-atomic.git > From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] > Sent: February-03-16 2:53 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

. Best regards, Hongbin From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] Sent: February-03-16 2:53 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options As long as configurations for 2.2 and 2.0 are compatible we shouldn't have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

n-kickstarts.git >[2] https://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-atomic.git > > >> From: Corey O'Brien [mailto:coreypobr...@gmail.com] >> Sent: February-03-16 2:53 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] B

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

Hey team, I've been looking into https://bugs.launchpad.net/magnum/+bug/1541105 which covers a bug with etcdctl, and I wanted opinions on how best to fix it. Should we update the image to include the latest version of etcd? Or, should we temporarily install the latest version as a part of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

Hi Corey, This is slowing down our merge rate and needs to be fixed IMHO. What risk are you talking about when using newer version of etcd ? Is it documented somewhere for the team to have a look ? -Vilobh On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Corey O'Brien wrote: > Hey

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Bug 1541105 options

As long as configurations for 2.2 and 2.0 are compatible we shouldn't have an issue I wouldn't think. I just don't know enough about etcd deployment to be sure about that. If we want to quickly improve the gate, I can patch the problematic areas in the templates and then we can make a blueprint