In fact, we didn’t officially announced this feature at all. It’s not fully
implemented and tested yet. Even though it’s now kind of a policy (even though
we removed “policies” keyword at all) I tend to agree that it needs to be a
property of “with-items” semantically because we were unable to f
Hi, Dmitri!
AFAIK, we made the decision that 'concurrency' is a policy (and our schema
allows to add 'concurrency' property in DSL).
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Dmitri Zimine
wrote:
> Folks, pls remind me where we ended up with ‘concurrency’?
>
> In the current implementation concurrency i
Folks, pls remind me where we ended up with ‘concurrency’?
In the current implementation concurrency is a task policy (and not sure how
much we tested it, not with unit testing/automated testing).
Also I recall discussing/ going back and forth re if concurrency is a task
policy or it belongs t
