Hi Jorge,
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Jorge Miramontes <
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> 1) We are assuming that load balancers can only operate on one update at a
> time correct? I.E. We are not allowing multiple updates to occur
> concurrently? Whatever the case on this I advoca
;OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] dealing with M:N
relashionships for Pools and Listeners
>Hi,
>
>From deep below in the e-mail chain:
>Same here. Cascade-deleting of shared objects should not be allowed
List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] dealing with M:N relashionships
for Pools and Listeners
Hi y'all!
Re-responses inline:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Brandon Logan
mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com>> wrote:
> § Where can a
Hi y'all!
Re-responses inline:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Brandon Logan
wrote:
>
> > § Where can a user check the success of the update?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Depending on the object... either the status of the child object
> > itself or all of its affected parent(s). Since we're a
Hi Sam and Stephen,
On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 21:10 -0700, Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
>
> Here are my thoughts on this:
>
>
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Samuel Bercovici
> wrote:
> Before solving everything, I would like first to itemize the
> things we should solv
Hi Sam,
Here are my thoughts on this:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Samuel Bercovici
wrote:
> Before solving everything, I would like first to itemize the things we
> should solve/consider.
>
> So pleas focus first on what is it that we need to pay attention for and
> less on how to solve
Before solving everything, I would like first to itemize the things we should
solve/consider.
So pleas focus first on what is it that we need to pay attention for and less
on how to solve such issues.
Follows the list of items:
· Provisioning status/state
o Should it only be on the l
