I agree with Brandon that it will be difficult to find spaces for Octavia,
and the pod is a valid option.
Nevertheless it is always worth trying.
For the traditional load balancing service instead I reckon #1 is a very
good thing to discuss. Problem is that it is also hard to conclude anything
in
With a corrected Subject. Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com
wrote:
LBaaS team,
As we discussed in the Weekly LBaaS meeting this morning we should make
sure we get the design sessions scheduled that we are interested in.
We currently agreed on
Hi Susanne--
Regarding the Octavia sessions: I think we probably will have enough to
discuss that we could use two design sessions. However, I also think that
we can probably come to conclusions on whether Octavia should become a part
of Neutron Incubator right away via discussion on this
Let's use a different email thread to discuss if Octavia should be part of
the Neutron incubator project right away or not. I would like to keep the
two discussions separate.
Susanne
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi Susanne--
Regarding the
Adding correct subject tags because I replied to the original email. I
blame you Susanne!
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 23:47 -0500, Brandon Logan wrote:
I'm not sure exactly how many design sessions will be available but it
seems like 2 for Neutron LBaaS and 2 for Octavia will be hard to
accomplish.
