Was the original reasoning to use StrongSwan over OpenSwan, only because of
community support? I vaguely recall something mentioned about StrongSwan having
additional capabilities or something. Can anyone confirm?
As far as which option, it sounds like B or C-2 are the better choices, just
Hi Paul
2013/8/20 Paul Michali p...@cisco.com:
Was the original reasoning to use StrongSwan over OpenSwan, only because of
community support? I vaguely recall something mentioned about StrongSwan
having additional capabilities or something. Can anyone confirm?
As far as which option, it
Hi folks
I would like to discuss whether supporting OpenSwan or StrongSwan or Both for
ipsec driver?
We choose StrongSwan because of the community is active and plenty of docs.
However It looks like RHEL is only supporting OpenSwan.
so we should choose
(A) Support StrongSwan
(B) Support
As I said during the meeting, I am happy to support both as long as the
code churn is reasonably contained and the chances of strongswan support
introducing bugs into openswan driver are negligible.
Openswan should be the default solution, in muy opinion.
Salvatore
On 20 August 2013 00:15,
Hi Salvatore
Thank you for your comment.
I'm adding OpenSwan support as additional driver, so it is safe for strongswan.
Best
Nachi
2013/8/19 Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com:
As I said during the meeting, I am happy to support both as long as the code
churn is reasonably contained and
